Skip to main content

UFC Fighter Tony Ferguson Arrested for DUI: Potential Criminal and Civil Liability Threaten Career

The recent arrest of UFC fighter Tony Ferguson for driving under the influence (DUI) and flipping his Chevy Silverado truck has placed his career in jeopardy, as both criminal and civil liabilities loom over the athlete. Hollywood Police records indicate the arrest occurred at 2 a.m. and that Ferguson was booked into the Hollywood Community Police Station hours afterward. He was reportedly being held on $30,000 bond at the time of the Los Angeles car accident, which TMZ first reported on Sunday evening.

Hollywood, CA, May 7, 2023- UFC lightweight contender Tony Ferguson found himself in hot water after being arrested for driving under the influence and hitting two parked cars outside a popular nightclub. Tony was arrested at the scene and is facing a misdemeanor DUI. He’s also looking at a license suspension as he refused to take a field sobriety test. Rapper Cash Gotti, who owns one of the vehicles posted an Instagram video showing his damaged Mercedes. The arrested Fergusson, complete with bloodshot eyes, was sent to the cooler by then.

Before the accident occurred, Tony Ferguson, a former champion in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) lightweight division, had not been performing well in his recent fights. He had lost his last five matches and had a record of 25 wins and eight losses. In his most recent fight, which took place on September 10, 2022, in Las Vegas, he was defeated by Nate Diaz through submission. It is worth noting that Diaz himself was recently arrested for being involved in a physical altercation and choking someone.

Despite Ferguson’s reputation for being a skilled fighter inside the UFC Octagon, he now faces serious legal consequences that could negatively impact his future in the UFC. In 2019, Ferguson’s wife, Cristina Servin, took legal action by filing for a restraining order against him. She later explained that it was an attempt to ensure he received the necessary mental health assistance. However, Servin withdrew the restraining order just a month after filing it.

According to law enforcement reports, Ferguson was pulled over by local police in Hollywood during the early hours of Sunday. The officers detected signs of intoxication, leading to calls for a field sobriety test (FST), which the fighter allegedly refused. Subsequently, Ferguson, who reeked of alcohol, was arrested on charges of driving under the influence, a serious offense, and failing to submit to a FST, which can carry significant penalties. The good news is that he is in a soft-on-crime state, so nothing much is likely to happen based on current trends in the Golden State.

If convicted, Ferguson may face fines, license suspension, mandatory alcohol education programs, and even potential jail time. These consequences could have long-lasting repercussions on his personal life and professional career, tarnishing his reputation within the UFC community.

Civil Liability Looms: Tony Ferguson’s UFC Career Hangs in the Balance Following DUI Incident

Apart from the criminal charges, Ferguson may also face civil liability for his actions. If anyone was injured or property was damaged as a result of the DUI incident, the affected parties could file civil lawsuits against the fighter. This could potentially result in substantial financial damages awarded to the plaintiffs, further complicating Ferguson’s future prospects.

The Property Damage Claims

Here, the diminished value of Cash Gotti’s car could be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars alone. Plus, there is a second vehicle, other destruction, and the use of critical city resources. Fergusson is legally liable for all of this, and there is no mention of how much insurance he was carrying. So, in addition to probably losing his UFC contract, Ferguson could end up broke.

UFC Career at Stake:

Ferguson’s arrest and subsequent legal battle jeopardized his personal life and now pose a significant threat to his flourishing UFC career and any endorsements for ads. The organization has strict conduct policies in place, emphasizing the importance of integrity and professionalism among its athletes. Any criminal charges, especially those related to substance abuse and endangerment, can lead to severe consequences for fighters.

Potential UFC Fallout

The UFC’s disciplinary actions may range from fines and suspensions to contract termination, depending on the severity of the offense and the athlete’s history. Considering Ferguson’s past accomplishments and popularity among fans, the UFC may face a difficult decision regarding his future involvement in the sport. But when a truck flips over, and people are harmed on public roads, the UFC may not be too hot on automatic forgiveness.

Redirect with Rehabilitation and Redemption?

While the legal ramifications may seem dire, Ferguson has the opportunity to take responsibility for his actions, seek rehabilitation, and demonstrate a commitment to change. Engaging in substance abuse programs, addressing personal issues, and making amends to those affected could potentially mitigate the negative impact on his UFC career.


Tony Ferguson’s recent DUI arrest has put his UFC career on the line, as he faces potential criminal charges and civil liability. The outcome of his legal proceedings will play a crucial role in determining his future within the organization. The uncooperative fighter now stands at a crossroads where personal redemption and professional consequences intersect, highlighting the importance of accountability and rehabilitation in the face of adversity. Although he has rights, checking his behavior and engaging in a rehabilitation process with a MADD and AA course sound like one of the best ways to redirect his career. What do you think?

Can Nate Diaz be Sued Over New Orleans Street Brawl

In a recent incident that has garnered significant attention, renowned mixed martial artist and former UFC star Nate Diaz found himself at the center of a street brawl in New Orleans. Diaz, now facing a felony charge, is among the most famous MMA fighters, with him and his brother considered true OGs in the fight game. Nate had two fights with Conor McGregor, winning one by submission in 2016 and losing one by decision the same year. The altercation occurred on April 24, 2023, in a crowded public space on Bourbon Street. The dude Diaz choked on the iPhone video is Logan Paul stunt double, Rodney Petersen.

The Misfits boxing event turned street fight took place while Diaz was attending the event to support his longtime teammate, Chris Avila, defeating Paul Bamba. In the outdoor footage, Diaz can be seen applying a chokehold to TikTok star Rodney Petersen, rendering him unconscious in the scuffle. The intensity of the altercation has sparked debates about the appropriate use of force and self-defense in such circumstances. A woman could be heard exclaiming the men should “stop” before Diaz caused great harm, at which point Diaz dropped Petersen to the pavement like a rag doll.


Some observers argue that Diaz’s actions were justified as a response to perceived threats or provocation, while others express concern about the level of aggression displayed. Additionally, Diaz was involved in another incident that same night when he had a brief scuffle with Chase DeMoor, a reality TV star. Eyewitnesses report that Diaz threw a water bottle at DeMoor during the event, further adding to the tension and excitement surrounding the viral clip that evening.

DeMoor went on Twitter, asserting: “next time don’t run” towards Diaz. “Nate Diaz decided to get mad and throw a prime bottle on me, that’s cute bro…” “Just next time don’t run. And stop spending a lot of your nights in the club trying to use your dried up MMA career to pull college girls.”

As news of these altercations spread, discussions have emerged regarding the boundaries of acceptable behavior in the context of sports events and public appearances to promote a boxing match, etc. Legal experts emphasize the importance of considering the specific set of circumstances and applicable laws when evaluating the actions of individuals involved in physical altercations and fights. Either way, the New Orleans police collected on their charged arrest warrant, and Diaz entered a plea of not guilty to the charge at his preliminary court hearing.

While the investigation into these incidents is ongoing, it serves as a reminder of the need for measured responses and the exploration of non-violent means to address conflicts. The consequences of such altercations caught on tape can extend beyond the immediate event, impacting the reputations and careers of those involved.

It remains to be seen how these incidents’ legal and public ramifications will unfold with each entourage. As the world spotlight shines on Nate Diaz and his actions during the Misfits Boxing 6 card, the incident serves as a catalyst for broader conversations about sportsmanship, self-control, and the responsibilities that come with public figures engaging in physical confrontations.

Either way, in a statement, Zach Rosenfield, Nate’s lawyer, says this clearly demonstrated that a “trained fighter named Rodney Petersen aggressively pursued Nate with the intention of engaging him, and once doing so, Nate acted entirely in self-defense.” Diaz left the UFC in 2022 upon the expiration of his contract, leaving him free to pursue a different Youtube arena.

In another viral video, Nate’s old UFC boss Dana White asks someone if the choked opponent was Logan Paul, Jake’s brother, stating: ‘He knocked him out! Whoever that is, he knocked him out. ‘That guy’s head bounced like a f***ing basketball.’ ‘He’s going to get sued like a motherf****r’.’

Unlikely ally, Conor McGregor even tweeted: “Hahaha Nate on a rampage tonight guys! Let’s go, Nate! Hahaha.”

Police claim Petersen was discovered “bleeding from the rear of his head,” and the Louisiana District Attorney has the power to pull Nate’s boxing card with jailtime.

“I don’t know what the hell I did to Nate Diaz,” Petersen said later on Youtube. “But I’m telling you what, I’m going to knock him the fuck out when I know he’s coming. You caught me off guard, dude. What did you think I was, Logan?” So clearly, Petersen is not that injured if he is already fired up for war.

The fact Diaz fought professionally doesn’t help when it comes to defending against the charges. If convicted, he could do up to eight years in prison. However, most experts don’t think that will happen once they watch the video that seems to be shot by a cell phone camera.

Staged to Remind People of Jake Paul Fight?

This has prompted many to say it was a put-on to remind people that Nate Diaz is expected to fight Jake Paul on August 5, 2023. This street fight with Peterson and the recent US Marine rear naked choke on a NY subway has raised questions about the use of force and self-defense in such situations. Eyewitnesses and video footage captured the intense moments as Diaz engaged in a physical confrontation that could place what’s left of his purportedly dried-up MMA career at risk of a second-degree battery conviction.

Self Defense?

Assuming the police think this was self-defense, Diaz could still face a civil lawsuit for assault, battery, or even false imprisonment. The facts show the incident unfolded in the heart of New Orleans, where Diaz was visiting for a public appearance. Reports indicate that a verbal exchange between Diaz and another individual quickly escalated into a physical confrontation. Witnesses claim that Diaz acted in self-defense, responding to what he perceived as an imminent threat to his safety.

Video footage of the incident has circulated widely on social media, showcasing the intense nature of the brawl. However, conflicting witness accounts have further complicated the understanding of the events. Some witnesses assert that Diaz acted aggressively, while others maintain that his actions were a necessary response to protect himself. Either way, if sued, Diaz will run up significant legal bills.

Law enforcement officials arrived at the scene shortly after the altercation had subsided. They initiated an investigation into the incident to determine the circumstances and establish legal accountability. The city police have reviewed available video evidence from the streets, interviewed witnesses, issued an arrest warrant, and are working to gather additional information to understand the incident comprehensively.

Legal experts highlight that the evaluation of Diaz’s actions will depend on several factors, including the applicable self-defense laws in New Orleans. These laws generally require individuals to use only reasonable force to protect themselves from harm. Diaz’s background as a professional fighter may also be a point of consideration in assessing his response. When I was growing up people always said a black belt is considered a scheduled deadly weapon. Throwing a water bottle earlier in the night tends to show he was acting in a dangerous manner.

As the investigation against the former UFC star continues forward, the incident has ignited debates surrounding the appropriate use of force, self-defense, and the public perception of professional fighters. It serves as a reminder of the complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding physical altercations and the need to thoroughly examine the facts before drawing conclusions about this guy, or anyone else that weekend.

Authorities have indicated that charges may be filed against those involved once the investigation concludes. In the meantime, the incident involving Nate Diaz in the New Orleans street brawl remains a topic of discussion, prompting reflections on the boundaries of self-defense and the consequences of physical altercations in public spaces. This fight will undoubtedly help push the Misfits Boxing fight Jake Paul has been touting into the PPV stratosphere.

Can Nate Diaz be Sued over New Orleans Street Brawl?

Yes. But this state follows a different civil legal system. New Orleans, being part of the state of Louisiana, is governed under a unique legal system known as civil law. Unlike the majority of states in the United States, which follow the common law tradition inherited from English law, Louisiana’s legal system is based on the civil law tradition derived from French and Spanish legal systems. This distinction is a result of Louisiana’s historical roots as a French and Spanish colony before it became part of the United States.

Under French civil law, legal principles are primarily derived from statutes and codes enacted by the legislature. These statutes provide the foundation for the legal framework, and courts interpret and apply the law based on these statutes. Additionally, legal decisions from higher courts also serve as binding precedents in subsequent cases. The civil law system places less emphasis on judicial decisions and the concept of binding precedent compared to the common law system.

Here, Peterson will sue Diaz under the civil law democracy system of law I am unfamiliar with. I am only licensed to practice law in Texas and California courts. The difference between a lawsuit for battery in California and Louisiana lies primarily in the legal principles and procedures that govern these cases within each state’s respective legal systems. While both states recognize the concept of battery as a civil tort, there may be variations in how certain elements are defined and how cases are litigated.

  1. Legal Elements: In California, battery is generally defined as the intentional and harmful or offensive touching of another person without their consent. The focus is on the act of physical contact and the absence of consent.

In Louisiana, the battery is referred to as “intentional tort” or “offense against the person.” It encompasses various types of intentional harm, including physical violence or offensive touching. Louisiana law recognizes both general intentional torts and specific offenses against the person, such as simple battery, aggravated battery, and assault.

Since insurance won’t cover an intentional tort award, Diaz will likely have to pay out of pocket, and he is not making the kind of money he used to as a UFC hero. He could even face punitive damages depending on the rights of the very peeved Petersen. Some people think this has a resemblance to a staged fight to make the Nate Diaz/Paul fight a larger purse, but it remains unclear. Either way, it doesn’t seem like Petersen thinks that is true, setting this potential tort as a crime.

  1. Legal Standards: California applies an intentional tort law standard to establish liability for battery, requiring the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted without consent and that the plaintiff suffered harm as a result.

On the other hand, Louisiana employs a “fault” system, emphasizing the intentionality or recklessness of the defendant’s actions. The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant’s conduct was intentional or that they acted with conscious disregard for the potential harm caused.

  1. Comparative Fault: California follows a comparative fault system, where damages awarded to the plaintiff may be reduced proportionately based on the plaintiff’s own negligence or contribution to the incident.

Comparative fault is also recognized in Louisiana, but the state follows a “pure comparative fault” rule. Under this rule, the plaintiff’s damages are reduced by their own percentage of fault, regardless of how much they contributed to the incident.

  1. Civil Law Tradition: Louisiana’s legal system is based on civil law, as influenced by the Napoleonic Code and the French and Spanish legal traditions. It places a greater emphasis on codified laws and statutes. At the same time, California operates within the common law tradition, relying on judicial decisions and legal precedents to guide the interpretation and application of the law.

In Louisiana, the battery is referred to as an “intentional tort” or “offense against the person.” It encompasses various types of intentional harm, including physical violence or offensive touching. Louisiana law recognizes both general intentional torts and specific offenses against the person, such as simple battery, aggravated battery, and assault.

Since insurance won’t cover an intentional tort award, Diaz will likely have to pay out of pocket, and he is not making the kind of money he used to as a UFC hero. He could even face punitive damages depending on the rights of the very peeved Petersen. Some people think this has a resemblance to a staged fight to make the Nate Diaz/Paul fight a larger purse, but it remains unclear. Either way, it doesn’t seem like Petersen thinks that is true, setting this potential tort as a crime.

Comparative fault is also recognized in Louisiana, but the state follows a “pure comparative fault” rule. Under this rule, the plaintiff’s damages are reduced by their own percentage of fault, regardless of how much they contributed to the incident.

It is important to consult with an attorney specializing in the specific jurisdiction’s laws to understand the nuances and any recent developments that may impact a battery lawsuit in California or Louisiana. It is important to note that while Louisiana follows the civil law tradition, some aspects of common law influence can be found in certain areas, in things such as property law and contracts.

These areas may somewhat incorporate principles and concepts from common law jurisdictions. However, overall, the legal system in New Orleans and the state of Louisiana remains rooted in civil law principles. Fortunately, acting to use the legal system to resolve the matter means each man will stay alive and have his day in court. If you want to learn more about tort law, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE.

Pfizer Allowed Dangerous Components in Its Vaccines – Is FDA Asleep?

Did you know that many NIH scientists promoting mRNA receive a royalty kickback from the pharmaceutical industry? In law, we call this a conflict of interest. To this day, Doctor Anthony Fauci refuses to tell the American people how much he received in royalty payments to push two years of economic lockdowns on the American people. Although he claims to donate them to charity, almost every celebrity donates to their OWN charities.


So why all the hush-hush? Sadly, investigative journalism appears to be dead. Only so-called “conspiracy theorists” seem to be covering the truth about the multiple convicted criminal felon pharma company Pfizer and others. Did you also know that several directors of the CDC are aligned with Bill Gates and other population control advocates? Did you know that many CDC and FDA heads worked for or got cushy jobs with BIG PHARMA after leaving their government positions? Do you think this is a problem?

I am attorney Michael Ehline. I am not “anti-vax.” In fact, mRNA does not inoculate as the Polio Vaccine did. In fact, the government changed the legal definition of vaccine once this fact came to light, and the lapdog press said it’s totally normal to change the definition. My mother-in-law died of Thrombosis (a known side effect of the emergency use “vaccines”) after being injected with the Moderna “vaccine.”

For-profit media and Silicon Valley receive billions in advertising money in ad spend from Pfizer and other billion-dollar medical corporations; the current US Administration (FDA, CDC pharma Axis) appears to be a revolving door for Big Pharma heads. Our personal injury attorneys have done extensive research so as to present both sides of the mRNA story.

A recent investigation into the mRNA vaccine quality issues revealed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains Truncated mRNA, and their negligence could have far greater repercussions than we are led to believe. Let’s explore the details of the investigation with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.

What Is Truncated mRNA?

Between the genetic code in our DNA that consists of nucleotides and the protein it produces that consists of amino acids, there is a bridge molecule referred to as translator or the “messenger” ribonucleic acid (mRNA).

The mRNA is a single-stranded RNA produced from the DNA template during transcription. A truncated mRNA occurs when there is a partial degradation of full-length mRNAs or when there is a premature termination of transcription, a process of copying a segment of DNA into RNA. However, many scientists say this is dishonest as well. They claim this is “modified” RNA.

What Impact Does the Truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccines Have on Humans?

The Pfizer mRNA sequence is 4,284 nucleotides in length, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure. To understand how the truncated mRNA can impact a human, we must first understand the basics of genetic code, such as a codon and open reading frame.

A codon is a sequence of three nucleotides that together form a unit of genetic code in a DNA or RNA. An open reading frame is a DNA sequence between the start and stop codons, with the stop codon at the end of a translatable region.

Just like brakes are essential to a vehicle to prevent accidents, the stop codon works similarly. When there are premature stop codons in an mRNA, the protein of interest is incomplete and, therefore, not produced, leading to a truncated mRNA. 

However, if the truncated mRNA does not have a stop codon, it can be lethal to humans as the DNA may start producing highly toxic proteins.

Investigations Reveal Truncated mRNA in Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is a European agency in charge of evaluating and supervising pharmaceutical products in Europe. In its report titled “EMA/CHMP/448917/2021”, the agency requested Pfizer to address specific issues about their COVID-19 vaccine, including the impurities in the product described by the agency as “truncated and modified mRNA.”

According to the assessment report, Pfizer had a deadline of July 2021 to meet to address the concerns raised by EMA and provide the agency with monthly data on the potential of autoimmune conditions arising from truncated spike protein.

It is important to note that the EMA did not simply raise the concern, but in the report, it marked the Truncated mRNA as a major objection, which is a formal regulatory red flag. These biological agents deployed by the pharmaceutical company targeted the entire globe without any explanation for the truncated mRNA.

By June 2022, a leaked photo of a meeting between the Pfizer officials and the EMA discussing the major concern surfaced on Trial Site News. According to the EMA, there was a need for sufficiently characterizing the truncated mRNA, describing it, and investigating whether it was the same across all batches of the mRNA vaccines.

Pfizer Acknowledges Truncated mRNA and Responds to EMA in an Official Meeting

During the meeting, as evident from the leaked presentation slide, Pfizer and their officials acknowledged truncated mRNA in their mRNA vaccines. The officials responded that most of the truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines are 1,500 to 3,500 nucleotides long, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure without a Poly(A) tail and the stop codon.

Since the DNA does not have a stop codon, there is no stop signal meaning that the amino acid chain continues prolongation, which prolongs the mRNA spike protein. In the DNA sequence, if the spike protein takes over, it will lead to further spike protein with multiple repeats since there is no stop codon. During this process, a different mRNA can take over; if that happens, the DNA sequence will create unknown proteins.

What’s fishy about all this is that when you download the EMA report titled “Type II group of the variations assessment report,” on page 17, table 2 Poly(A) content, it is completely blacked out.

Researchers use the “western blot” method, an analytical technique to detect specific proteins in a tissue homogenate or extract sample. It can help researchers analyze the size and count of the protein. 

The EMA requested Pfizer-BioNTech to submit experimental findings of their mRNA vaccines to show that they would not lead to fragmented protein. This requirement by the EMA is a basic requirement that pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers must address before humans can use the vaccines.

However, since this is the first time using mRNA vaccines across a large population, the quality issue is the first of its kind. There is uncertainty over any previous quality standard to help manage truncated mRNA.

To fulfill the bare minimum requirements of EMA, in December 2020, Pfizer provided them with digitized western blot figures that showed the levels of spike protein in their Covid-19 COVID-19 vaccines and suggested that no other proteins were produced. In a report published by FDA, Pfizer stated that their COVID-19 vaccine protein is consistent with the expected size and comparable across all batches.

In 2021, Pfizer provided another digitized western blot figure that showed that their COVID-19 vaccine did not produce proteins in vitro.

However, all the western plots provided are entirely digitized, raising further concerns over their experimental findings’ results.

Did Pfizer Provide Fake Western Blots?

Pfizer submitted many sets of western blots which could be fake. The proteins have different sizes, and they separate at various locations. There are certain factors that affect the appearance of western blots, including protein transfer speed, incubation duration, and antibody concentration. All of these suggest that western blots cannot be perfect, and there will always be distortions.

Many western blots provided by Pfizer seem too perfect, and they appear spotlessly clean and perfectly rectangular. All the Western blots are noiseless and appear to be fake.

Why Did the EMA Approve the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines Despite Dangerous Components?

According to the EMA, there is a need for further categorization, but the lack of experimental data on truncated mRNA should not lead to any conclusions. 

At the end of the report, the EMA states that there are no longer any issues with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, and by December 12, 2020, the EMA gave Pfizer marketing authorization.

Several questions arise from the EMA’s conclusion over Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines. How did Pfizer resolve the issues raised by the EMA? Did the pharmaceutical company provide them with fake Western blots and receive an approval nod? Did the counterfeit reports manage to get the support of the regulatory body? Does the EMA know the reports are fake yet give the vaccine manufacturer the approval nod? How did this get under FDA’s Radar, or do they not care?

Are All Covid-19 Approved Vaccines mRNA?

Although researchers have studied mRNA for decades, during the pandemic, it was the first time they ever got to use it to create a vaccine. Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are mRNA vaccines, while others use different technologies, with Novavax creating their vaccine using a process similar to developing a flu vaccine.

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved using the only mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, in the United States.

Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Ingredients

The following is the breakdown of the ingredients used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine:

  • Messenger ribonucleic acid: mRNA provides instructions to the body to create a form of protein from the Covid-19 virus. Although the Johnson vaccine is not mRNA, it also instructs the body to form protein from the COVID-19 virus by entering the human cells using the DNA stored inside a modified vector virus.
  • Lipids: are a broad group of organic compounds that are fatty acids. The following are some of the lipids used to create Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: 2[(polyethylene glycol (PEG))-2000]-N, N-di tetradecyl acetamide
  • 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
  • Cholesterol (plant-derived)
  • ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)
  • Salt: Sodium chloride, a form of salt, and other salts are essential to the human body as it helps maintain fluid levels. It also aids in the stability of the Covid-19 vaccine. The following are the different types of salt used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: Potassium chloride
  • Monobasic potassium phosphate
  • Sodium chloride
  • Dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
  • Other ingredients, including sugar, help maintain the vaccine’s stability and keep the molecule in shape.

Other brand vaccines also use citric acid monohydrate (Johnson & Johnson), acetic acid (Moderna vaccines), and ethanol.

Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Triggers a Severe Allergic Reaction

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 20 cases of severe allergic reactions were recovered or discharged home. Many scientists believe that the compound polyethylene glycol in the messenger RNA is causing a rare form of allergic reaction in some people who have taken the Pfizer vaccine.

Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a component in some drugs, it was never used to create a vaccine. The compound has occasionally resulted in anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction of the immune system, the body’s natural defense system, overreacting to a trigger. Scientists believe that people with high levels of PEG have an increased risk of anaphylactic reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Could Pfizer End up in Trouble with Their Covid-19 Vaccines?

Vaccine manufacturers have immunity against legal actions for any injuries caused by their vaccine. It is important to note that pandemics like COVID-19 arrive unexpectedly, and vaccine manufacturers do not have much time to experiment and carry out human trials, so they receive immunity against legal action if their vaccines cause injuries.

However, the immunity does not extend to the negligence carried out by vaccine manufacturers. If Pfizer knows their COVID-19 vaccines are impure and intentionally provides fake reports to receive market authorization, it could put them in hot waters.

Further investigation can help reveal the depth of the situation and the damage the pharmaceutical company has done with their truncated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on a global scale. The problem is that Pfizer seems to control the messaging with billions in ad money. Why would a journalist who wants to keep their job report anything negative, even if it’s true?

Arnold Schwarzenegger Gets into Crash with Cyclist – Is He Liable?

On February 5, 2023, an accident occurred involving the former California governor and a bicyclist in West Los Angeles. Let’s explore the details of the news with Ehline Law and our bicycle personal injury attorneys.

Arnold Schwarzenegger Involved in an Accident in West Los Angeles, Not at Fault

While driving around West Los Angeles on Sunday morning, the former California governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, was reportedly involved in an accident with a woman riding a bicycle.

Victim Moved to the Hospital after Complaints of Pain

At around 10:30 AM, the Los Angeles Police Department received a call about a traffic collision at San Vicente Boulevard and Burlingame Avenue. 

First responders reached the accident scene to take the bicyclist to the emergency room in a nearby hospital as she complained of pain following the “simple traffic accident.” Fortunately, there were no serious injuries, and the woman is in stable condition.

Law Enforcement Sources Believe It’s Not the Actor’s Fault in the Traffic Collision

When the Los Angeles Police Department officers arrived at the accident scene, Arnold Schwarzenegger was waiting at the curb to answer any questions about the incident. 

After speaking to three witnesses and talking to the former governor, the police officers reported that the accident was not the fault of the actor as the woman swerved into the path of the SUV he was driving.

Arnold Did Not Have a Chance to Hit the Brakes, LAPD Reports

The law enforcement authorities believe that Arnold Schwarzenegger did not have any time to react to the incident and prevent the collision from happening. Police sources told TMZ that there were no drugs or alcohol involved.

The Good Samaritan Takes Bicycle to Local Repair Shop after Car Accident

According to law enforcement sources, after the police wrapped up their investigation, Arnold Schwarzenegger picked up the crunched bike, loaded it up in his SUV, and took it to the local bike shop to fix it. That’s what we expect from the former California governor, a true gentleman!

This isn’t the first time Arnold Schwarzenegger was involved in a car accident. Last year in January, Arnold Schwarzenegger was driving his GMC Yukon when he collided with a Prius and rolled over it, causing minor injuries to the driver.

What Can Happen Following the Bicycle Accident Involving Arnold Schwarzenegger?

In the “Arnold Schwarzenegger gets into crash with cyclist” incident, the police stated that Arnold was not at-fault. However, in personal injury cases, an officer’s statement should not be the final verdict in deciding whether to pursue a claim against the negligent party.

We all love the Terminator, and that can have an influence on the police’s statement which is why it is crucial to carry out an impartial investigation. An experienced personal injury attorney can help investigate the accident to determine the liable party. Perhaps, the Terminator is not at-fault. Even if the bicyclist is partially at-fault, she may still be able to recover compensation under California’s comparative negligence rule.

It is also important to note that minor injuries may worsen over time, and the bicyclist needs to pay attention to any symptoms she develops over the next few days. Even minor accidents involving a bicyclist can lead to severe injuries, for which injured victims may pursue compensation against the negligent party.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law’s Bicycle Law Experts

If you’ve suffered injuries in a bicycle accident, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be able to seek compensation.

Joseph Zhou Arrested in Accident on 8 Freeway – Felony and Civil Action?

On November 20, 2022, police arrested a San Marcos man involved in a fatal DUI accident in El Centro, California, on Interstate 8. Let’s explore the details of the news with Ehline Law and our car crash personal injury attorneys.

Fatal Collision Between Kia Forte and 2022 Toyota Tacoma in El Centro Leaves One Dead and Two Injured

When he entered the center median, Joseph Zhou, a 24-year-old man, was driving his Toyota Tacoma westbound on 8 Freeway west of Mile Marker 20 at about 5:53 PM.

Slowly, Joseph Zhou transitioned to the eastbound lanes of the freeway, west of Dunaway Road, where he crashed into a Kia Forte driven by a woman.

Zhou Moved to Desert Regional Medical Center after Sustaining Major Injuries

According to the California Highway Patrol, the 20-year-old woman from Rahway, New Jersey, sustained fatal injuries and was pronounced dead at the accident scene, while Zhou sustained major injuries. The firefighters requested an air ambulance to move Joseph Zhou to Desert Regional Medical Center for medical treatment.

Another passenger suffered minor injuries, and the emergency crew transported them to a nearby hospital.

Zhou Charged with Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated and Felony DUI, California Highway Patrol States

Following his treatment, the police arrested Zhou for driving under the influence and gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

The medical examiner’s office has not released the woman’s name in the fatal accident on Interstate 8.

Is It a Felony, Driving under the Influence, in California?

Under California law, DUI can either be a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on prior DUI history. The first three DUI charges are a misdemeanor.

However, DUI is a felony if:

  • The defendant has had four DUIs in the last ten years
  • The defendant has a previous felony DUI
  • The defendant drove under the influence, causing injury
  • The defendant was driving under the influence with a minor in the car.

Joseph Zhou, arrested in an accident on 8 Freeway, was charged with a felony DUI causing injury and vehicular manslaughter.

Can the Deceased Person’s Estate Pursue Compensation for the Death of Their Loved One in the El Centro DUI Accident?

Although the prosecutors will proceed with the criminal case against Zhou, the deceased person’s estate can also bring a civil action against the drunk driver to recover compensation.

Typically, the recoverable damages in a wrongful death suit include funeral and burial expenses, lost income, loss of companionship, and pain and suffering.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law

If you lost a loved one in an accident due to another’s fault, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation.

A civil action may not bring back your loved one, but it can hold the accountable party responsible and get you compensation to pay for the expenses.