The COVID-19 new boosters target BA.5 omicron subvariant and will soon be available to the public.

A Cause for Concern?

What’s concerning is that the vaccine manufacturers, who have not had the time for human trials, have received a green signal for fall. Let’s explore the details of the news with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.

FDA Taking a Serious Gamble on Early Release of New Covid Boosters

The Biden Administration is pushing for a booster campaign to start in September, putting a lot of heat on mRNA vaccine-makers Pfizer and Moderna. The new COVID vaccines have only been tested on mice without going through human trials. It is a risky bet for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, relying on mice trials and similar vaccine human trial data.

The original vaccines went through human clinical trials at the NIAID’s vaccine research center before being available to the public.

Lack of Clinical Data Could Further Threaten Public Trust

The COVID-19 vaccine campaign in the United States was met with people who accepted the vaccine and the “anti-vaxxers,” who started their own social media campaign against the horrors of vaccination.

A few death cases arising from health complications after receiving vaccines further cemented anti-vaxxers’ narrative and lowered public trust, especially for booster doses. Federal Health officials hope the new boosters will provide more robust protection than the current booster doses while targeting the original strain. However, the lack of human trial data means that the FDA does not know whether the new vaccines will be more effective than the current ones or the health impact they may have on the vaccinated.

Many experts believe the FDA’s decision to proceed without human trials is risky. If the booster doses do not work as intended, it could be a severe dent in public trust. According to Dr. Celine Gounder, an infectious disease specialist, there is no reason to believe that the new vaccines might be unsafe. However, he remains skeptical whether it will be better than the current vaccines.

Barouch, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine maker, reported their boosters only had a marginal improvement in immune response over the original vaccine.

No Time for Human Trials, States FDA Health Advisor

It is important to remember that the FDA authorized the first version of mRNA vaccines after assessing safety and efficacy data based on the thousands of human trials conducted. The new mRNA vaccines target the original strain and BA.4 and BA.5 omicron subvariants.

Supporters of this controversial move believe that vaccine manufacturers have had a lot of experience in the past two years to deem the new vaccines safe without the need for human data.

Dr. Ofer Levy, an infectious disease specialist and an advisor to the FDA, argued that the death rate from coronavirus is more likely to jump during fall and winter. By implementing this approach, the FDA can prevent the severe disease from spreading.

Waning Effectiveness Could Mean Another Wave of Hospitalizations

The urgency of rolling out the new vaccines arises from the concern of the nation’s top health executives. Heather Scobie, a CDC epidemiologist, spoke about how deaths and hospitalizations in the country have risen again. He stated that the omicron variant continues to mutate into more transmissible subvariants capable of avoiding the protection offered by original vaccines.

Because of rapid mutations, concerns arise about the waning effectiveness of the older vaccines, which could lead to an increase in hospitalizations and deaths, especially with how people will spend most of their time indoors during winters, an environment for the virus to spread swiftly.

Mouse Experiments Are Notoriously Unreliable; Critics Say

Not everyone believes that the decision made by the FDA to roll out vaccines after only conducting mice trials would benefit the country. John Moore, an immunologist at Weill Cornell Medicine, finds it bizarre that the FDA is relying on animal studies as these are not predictive of the effects of the vaccine in humans. According to Moore, the FDA is just making guesswork rather than basing its decision on analysis and consultation with experts.

Health Officials Handling Covid Vaccines as Flu Vaccines

Deepta Bhattacharya, an immunobiologist, takes a somewhat logical approach to the argument. Speaking with NPR, he stated that health officials now understand vaccine development and how to work with them. Bhattacharya further said that flu vaccine manufacturers change their vaccine each year to match the latest strain but do not conduct yearly trials; the same is the case with Covid vaccines now. Researchers are handling it just like they would any flu vaccine.

Dr. Peter Marks, responsible for heading the FDA department that reviews vaccines, backed the organization, stating it is confident and has the experience to predict the effectiveness of the vaccines from available data using animal testing and without clinical trials.

Why Didn’t mRNA Vaccine Manufacturers Have Enough Time for Clinical Trials?

The two mRNA vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, initially focused on developing a vaccine with original spike protein targeting the omicron variant BA.1, responsible for many hospitalizations and deaths in the winter of 2021.

The rapid evolution of the COVID-19 virus has made it challenging for manufacturers to keep up with it. By the time the mRNA vaccine manufacturers decided to ready the vaccines, more transmissible subvariants had driven the BA.1 booster out of prevalence. The FDA requested the manufacturers to focus on targeting omicron BA.5, the latest dominant subvariant.

Such a decision did not allow mRNA vaccine manufacturers enough time to carry out clinical trials for their bivalent vaccines if they were to roll out the vaccines by fall to help prevent hospitalizations and deaths.

Immunity under PREP Act – Can You Sue for COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects?

In 2005, the president of the United States signed the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act or PREP Act, which provides legal protection to manufacturers and distributors of vaccines in the country, unless in the event of willful misconduct. It was a way to expedite vaccine development for infectious diseases.

Under the PREP Act, there is no party you can blame in the US court of law. You cannot sue the manufacturer or distributor for your vaccine side effects. What about the government? Can you sue them then, as many are also concerned about whether or not they can sue the Food and Drug Administration for side effects as they authorized the release of the vaccine without human clinical trials?

Because of sovereign immunity, you cannot sue the FDA as well! Many businesses are making it mandatory for all their employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Employers legally have the right to impose such a requirement on their employees, which means you cannot pursue legal action against your employers for any side effects of the vaccine you were “forced” into taking.

Workers can seek protection under anti-discrimination laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, which exempts workers from getting a vaccine if it violates their “sincerely held” religious beliefs.

In cases where an employee suffers severe side effects from a work-mandated COVID-19 vaccine, they may be able to apply through the workers’ compensation program, treating the side effects as a work-related injury. Still, there are significant limits on the FDA authorization of damages one can recover.

Recovering Damage for Immune Response Disinfo?

That said, governments have provided a way to recover some damages if anything were to go wrong following immunization to both the original strain and Omicron BA.1. Under the PERP Act, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program allows eligible individuals to recover benefits up to a specific limit based upon their human data and how it affected their human cells. After all, it’s all mouse data!

However, it can be challenging to recover under the program as the bar for evidence is relatively high, which can be an obstacle for those affected by COVID-19 vaccine side effects as compelling evidence of how it will infect cells is not available early on.

Recovering compensation under the workers’ compensation program may be easier if you contract side effects. To know more about your rights, you can go to the Ehline Law Firm website for a free consultation with legal experts there.

Did you know that many NIH scientists promoting mRNA receive a royalty kickback from the pharmaceutical industry? In law, we call this a conflict of interest. To this day, Doctor Anthony Fauci refuses to tell the American people how much he received in royalty payments to push two years of economic lockdowns on the American people. Although he claims to donate them to charity, almost every celebrity donates to their OWN charities.

Source: https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/scicheck-some-posts-about-nih-royalties-omit-that-fauci-said-he-donates-his-payments/

So why all the hush-hush? Sadly, investigative journalism appears to be dead. Only so-called “conspiracy theorists” seem to be covering the truth about the multiple convicted criminal felon pharma company Pfizer and others. Did you also know that several directors of the CDC are aligned with Bill Gates and other population control advocates? Did you know that many CDC and FDA heads worked for or got cushy jobs with BIG PHARMA after leaving their government positions? Do you think this is a problem?

I am attorney Michael Ehline. I am not “anti-vax.” In fact, mRNA does not inoculate as the Polio Vaccine did. In fact, the government changed the legal definition of vaccine once this fact came to light, and the lapdog press said it’s totally normal to change the definition. My mother-in-law died of Thrombosis (a known side effect of the emergency use “vaccines”) after being injected with the Moderna “vaccine.”

For-profit media and Silicon Valley receive billions in advertising money in ad spend from Pfizer and other billion-dollar medical corporations; the current US Administration (FDA, CDC pharma Axis) appears to be a revolving door for Big Pharma heads. Our personal injury attorneys have done extensive research so as to present both sides of the mRNA story.

A recent investigation into the mRNA vaccine quality issues revealed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains Truncated mRNA, and their negligence could have far greater repercussions than we are led to believe. Let’s explore the details of the investigation with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.

What Is Truncated mRNA?

Between the genetic code in our DNA that consists of nucleotides and the protein it produces that consists of amino acids, there is a bridge molecule referred to as translator or the “messenger” ribonucleic acid (mRNA).

The mRNA is a single-stranded RNA produced from the DNA template during transcription. A truncated mRNA occurs when there is a partial degradation of full-length mRNAs or when there is a premature termination of transcription, a process of copying a segment of DNA into RNA. However, many scientists say this is dishonest as well. They claim this is “modified” RNA.

What Impact Does the Truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccines Have on Humans?

The Pfizer mRNA sequence is 4,284 nucleotides in length, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure. To understand how the truncated mRNA can impact a human, we must first understand the basics of genetic code, such as a codon and open reading frame.

A codon is a sequence of three nucleotides that together form a unit of genetic code in a DNA or RNA. An open reading frame is a DNA sequence between the start and stop codons, with the stop codon at the end of a translatable region.

Just like brakes are essential to a vehicle to prevent accidents, the stop codon works similarly. When there are premature stop codons in an mRNA, the protein of interest is incomplete and, therefore, not produced, leading to a truncated mRNA. 

However, if the truncated mRNA does not have a stop codon, it can be lethal to humans as the DNA may start producing highly toxic proteins.

Investigations Reveal Truncated mRNA in Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is a European agency in charge of evaluating and supervising pharmaceutical products in Europe. In its report titled “EMA/CHMP/448917/2021”, the agency requested Pfizer to address specific issues about their COVID-19 vaccine, including the impurities in the product described by the agency as “truncated and modified mRNA.”

According to the assessment report, Pfizer had a deadline of July 2021 to meet to address the concerns raised by EMA and provide the agency with monthly data on the potential of autoimmune conditions arising from truncated spike protein.

It is important to note that the EMA did not simply raise the concern, but in the report, it marked the Truncated mRNA as a major objection, which is a formal regulatory red flag. These biological agents deployed by the pharmaceutical company targeted the entire globe without any explanation for the truncated mRNA.

By June 2022, a leaked photo of a meeting between the Pfizer officials and the EMA discussing the major concern surfaced on Trial Site News. According to the EMA, there was a need for sufficiently characterizing the truncated mRNA, describing it, and investigating whether it was the same across all batches of the mRNA vaccines.

Pfizer Acknowledges Truncated mRNA and Responds to EMA in an Official Meeting

During the meeting, as evident from the leaked presentation slide, Pfizer and their officials acknowledged truncated mRNA in their mRNA vaccines. The officials responded that most of the truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines are 1,500 to 3,500 nucleotides long, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure without a Poly(A) tail and the stop codon.

Since the DNA does not have a stop codon, there is no stop signal meaning that the amino acid chain continues prolongation, which prolongs the mRNA spike protein. In the DNA sequence, if the spike protein takes over, it will lead to further spike protein with multiple repeats since there is no stop codon. During this process, a different mRNA can take over; if that happens, the DNA sequence will create unknown proteins.

What’s fishy about all this is that when you download the EMA report titled “Type II group of the variations assessment report,” on page 17, table 2 Poly(A) content, it is completely blacked out.

Researchers use the “western blot” method, an analytical technique to detect specific proteins in a tissue homogenate or extract sample. It can help researchers analyze the size and count of the protein. 

The EMA requested Pfizer-BioNTech to submit experimental findings of their mRNA vaccines to show that they would not lead to fragmented protein. This requirement by the EMA is a basic requirement that pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers must address before humans can use the vaccines.

However, since this is the first time using mRNA vaccines across a large population, the quality issue is the first of its kind. There is uncertainty over any previous quality standard to help manage truncated mRNA.

To fulfill the bare minimum requirements of EMA, in December 2020, Pfizer provided them with digitized western blot figures that showed the levels of spike protein in their Covid-19 COVID-19 vaccines and suggested that no other proteins were produced. In a report published by FDA, Pfizer stated that their COVID-19 vaccine protein is consistent with the expected size and comparable across all batches.

In 2021, Pfizer provided another digitized western blot figure that showed that their COVID-19 vaccine did not produce proteins in vitro.

However, all the western plots provided are entirely digitized, raising further concerns over their experimental findings’ results.

Did Pfizer Provide Fake Western Blots?

Pfizer submitted many sets of western blots which could be fake. The proteins have different sizes, and they separate at various locations. There are certain factors that affect the appearance of western blots, including protein transfer speed, incubation duration, and antibody concentration. All of these suggest that western blots cannot be perfect, and there will always be distortions.

Many western blots provided by Pfizer seem too perfect, and they appear spotlessly clean and perfectly rectangular. All the Western blots are noiseless and appear to be fake.

Why Did the EMA Approve the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines Despite Dangerous Components?

According to the EMA, there is a need for further categorization, but the lack of experimental data on truncated mRNA should not lead to any conclusions. 

At the end of the report, the EMA states that there are no longer any issues with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, and by December 12, 2020, the EMA gave Pfizer marketing authorization.

Several questions arise from the EMA’s conclusion over Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines. How did Pfizer resolve the issues raised by the EMA? Did the pharmaceutical company provide them with fake Western blots and receive an approval nod? Did the counterfeit reports manage to get the support of the regulatory body? Does the EMA know the reports are fake yet give the vaccine manufacturer the approval nod? How did this get under FDA’s Radar, or do they not care?

Are All Covid-19 Approved Vaccines mRNA?

Although researchers have studied mRNA for decades, during the pandemic, it was the first time they ever got to use it to create a vaccine. Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are mRNA vaccines, while others use different technologies, with Novavax creating their vaccine using a process similar to developing a flu vaccine.

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved using the only mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, in the United States.

Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Ingredients

The following is the breakdown of the ingredients used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine:

• Messenger ribonucleic acid: mRNA provides instructions to the body to create a form of protein from the Covid-19 virus. Although the Johnson vaccine is not mRNA, it also instructs the body to form protein from the COVID-19 virus by entering the human cells using the DNA stored inside a modified vector virus.
• Lipids: are a broad group of organic compounds that are fatty acids. The following are some of the lipids used to create Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: 2[(polyethylene glycol (PEG))-2000]-N, N-di tetradecyl acetamide
• 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
• Cholesterol (plant-derived)
• ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)
• Salt: Sodium chloride, a form of salt, and other salts are essential to the human body as it helps maintain fluid levels. It also aids in the stability of the Covid-19 vaccine. The following are the different types of salt used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: Potassium chloride
• Monobasic potassium phosphate
• Sodium chloride
• Dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
• Other ingredients, including sugar, help maintain the vaccine’s stability and keep the molecule in shape.

Other brand vaccines also use citric acid monohydrate (Johnson & Johnson), acetic acid (Moderna vaccines), and ethanol.

Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Triggers a Severe Allergic Reaction

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 20 cases of severe allergic reactions were recovered or discharged home. Many scientists believe that the compound polyethylene glycol in the messenger RNA is causing a rare form of allergic reaction in some people who have taken the Pfizer vaccine.

Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a component in some drugs, it was never used to create a vaccine. The compound has occasionally resulted in anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction of the immune system, the body’s natural defense system, overreacting to a trigger. Scientists believe that people with high levels of PEG have an increased risk of anaphylactic reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Could Pfizer End up in Trouble with Their Covid-19 Vaccines?

Vaccine manufacturers have immunity against legal actions for any injuries caused by their vaccine. It is important to note that pandemics like COVID-19 arrive unexpectedly, and vaccine manufacturers do not have much time to experiment and carry out human trials, so they receive immunity against legal action if their vaccines cause injuries.

However, the immunity does not extend to the negligence carried out by vaccine manufacturers. If Pfizer knows their COVID-19 vaccines are impure and intentionally provides fake reports to receive market authorization, it could put them in hot waters.

Further investigation can help reveal the depth of the situation and the damage the pharmaceutical company has done with their truncated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on a global scale. The problem is that Pfizer seems to control the messaging with billions in ad money. Why would a journalist who wants to keep their job report anything negative, even if it’s true?

CDC Director Admits Agency Made ‘Pretty Dramatic, Pretty Public Mistakes’

Ultimate Guide to Understanding Government Funded Disinfo

It almost feels like citizens and medical professionals have been silenced over the past few years for trying to expose government organizations that didn’t always tell the public the complete story. Of course, we recently learned that the FBI and other agencies dictate who gets banned and even paid social media to help sell people on taking COVID-19 vaccines.

Additionally, the CDC changed the definition of “vaccine” when it was determined the so-called vaccines did not innoculate but only controlled symptoms. Several weeks ago, the CDC finally admitted the COVID death numbers were also off by tens of thousands. Yet we hear crickets from the pro-Biden Admin press or social media. Where do we go for the truth when the press and social media are tools of the left? This is the question many conservatives are asking.

Original Definition Changed When Facts Revealed People Taking the Shots Were Catching and Spreading COVID-19

Before evidence that these shots were not stopping COVID-19 from spreading, the accepted definition of vaccine meant that your body would become “inoculated” to “produce immunity to a specific disease.”

This is why people don’t get Polio. They were inoculated under the original definition. According to at least one source, “COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines as vaccines were defined before the current epidemic.” (Source – Journal Inquirer.)

You can’t make this stuff up. The FDA used the picture to compare taking Ivermectin to being a horse pill on their website, which amounted to a gift to Big Pharma. I am attorney Michael Ehline. I lost my mother-in-law to thrombosis. She died of thrombosis three days after receiving her COVID-19 injection (Johnson and Johnson version.) As a personal injury lawyer, I have first-hand knowledge of how some government agencies and some government employees violate taxpayers’ rights and how they use private corporations as state actors to try and destroy ordinary Americans.

We increasingly see politically minded employees at these agencies pushing a political agenda. We see no real punishment or loss of pensions. Hence, people like corrupt IRS agents and Democrat partisan Lois Lerner or corrupt FBI agent and Hillary Clinton supporter Peter Strzok have free reign to spread disinformation and blame the Russians. Try to find one negative article about Strzok on Google, and you will quickly see that this is not a made-up conspiracy.

This is the new normal, and only you can stop it by fact-checking the fact-checkers and finding out who pays these so-called “experts.” (Hint, Communist China either indirectly funds or controls much of the fact-checking.)

What Does the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Say About COVID-19 Disinfo?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director, Rochelle Walensky, acknowledged to staff members that the organization made some “pretty dramatic, pretty public mistakes” in handling the COVID-19 outbreak.

Walensky continued, “For 75 years, CDC and public health have been preparing for COVID-19, and in our big moment, our performance did not reliably meet expectations. As a long-time admirer of this agency and a champion for public health, I want us all to do better.”

Well, we couldn’t agree more!

People have been de-personed, demonized, and dismissed across all video and social media platforms for promoting the CDC’s bullet points while crafting a different story from the mainstream media. Marines were forced to give up their careers for failing to go along with the Biden Admin’s mRNA injection program.

This was after Fauci an,d the general public knew millions of tax-paid vaccines didn’t inoculate [So change the definition, and everyone gets a trophy]. Why the rush to force our federal employees to take an mRNA vaccine or lose their jobs, pensions, etc.?

Companies like Pfizer made billions and appropriately donated billions in campaign money to the politicians who pushed the mandatory vaccine agenda. So, let’s look at the outcome of years of censorship, banning people and doctors for pointing out everything we just stated above.

What Is the Plan Moving Forward Regarding Public Health?

Then, Walensky said something extraordinary, which seems to be standard procedure during the Biden administration, and said that the CDC needed its own “special forces” to be sent in sooner in case of other public health threats. She also spoke of an upcoming “reset” in response to the agency’s Covid response.

The CDC will overhaul every aspect of its operations and culture as part of the upcoming “reset,” shifting the emphasis away from academic research and toward prioritizing reacting to emerging emergencies.

Walensky stated:

“My goal is a new, public health action-oriented culture at CDC that emphasizes accountability, collaboration, communication, and timeliness.”

She believes this is the best way to help the CDC reach its fullest potential.

What Is the Need for a Reset?

The reset follows harsh criticism of the pandemic’s poor response time and conflicting information on masks, regulations, social exclusion, and testing.

Additionally, there has been growing criticism of how it has handled other hazards to health, such as the frightening spread of monkeypox. To put the changes into effect, Mary Wakefield, who oversaw the Health Resources and Services Administration under the Obama administration, has already begun working as a senior counselor.

She also said a new executive council is being formed to help Walensky set strategic plans and priorities. The change was a CDC initiative, not the White House or other administration members, insisted Walensky, who took over as head in January 2021.

However, since the White House and other agencies were extensively involved, Jason Schwartz, a health policy researcher at the Yale School of Public Health, emphasized that government inadequacies extend beyond the CDC.

Contact The Fraud Experts at Ehline Law Firm Today!

Is the CDC leading the way forward after the agency’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which many believed was subpar at best? Or is this just another specious attempt to ignore the CDC destroyed people’s lives with help from corrupt politicians, money-hungry corporations, and big for-profit media?

While all the terrific work the CDC has done has not been forgotten, it fell short in the coronavirus pandemic, which we cannot ignore. Targeting citizens for disagreeing is un-American. Weaponizing our agencies and using them to target free thinkers is nothing short of what Communist China does to its citizens. At Ehline Law, we prioritize US citizens’ safety, health, and well-being and hope we can take this statement as a positive step moving forward.

Citations:

• The CDC and States Are Misreporting COVID-19 Test Data