Author: MichaelEhline

Did you know that many NIH scientists promoting mRNA receive a royalty kickback from the pharmaceutical industry? In law, we call this a conflict of interest. To this day, Doctor Anthony Fauci refuses to tell the American people how much he received in royalty payments to push two years of economic lockdowns on them. Although he claims to donate them to charity, almost every celebrity donates to their charities.

Source: https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/scicheck-some-posts-about-nih-royalties-omit-that-fauci-said-he-donates-his-payments/

So why all the hush-hush? Sadly, investigative journalism appears to be dead. Only so-called “conspiracy theorists” seem to be covering the truth about the multiple convicted criminal felon pharma company Pfizer and others. Did you also know that several directors of the CDC are aligned with Bill Gates and other population control advocates? Did you know that many CDC and FDA heads worked for or got cushy jobs with BIG PHARMA after leaving their government positions? Do you think this is a problem?

I am attorney Michael Ehline. I am not “anti-vax.” MRNA does not inoculate as the Polio Vaccine did. The government changed the legal definition of vaccine once this fact came to light, and the lapdog press said it’s expected to change the definition. My mother-in-law died of Thrombosis (a known side effect of the emergency use “vaccines”) after being injected with the Moderna “vaccine.”

For-profit media and Silicon Valley receive billions in advertising money from Pfizer and other billion-dollar medical corporations; the current US Administration (FDA, CDC pharma Axis) appears to be a revolving door for Big Pharma heads. Our personal injury attorneys have done extensive research to present both sides of the mRNA story.

A recent investigation into the mRNA vaccine quality issues revealed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains Truncated mRNA, and their negligence could have far more significant repercussions than we are led to believe. Let’s explore the details of the investigation with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.

What Is Truncated mRNA?

Between the genetic code in our DNA, which consists of nucleotides, and the protein it produces, which consists of amino acids, there is a bridge molecule referred to as the translator or the “messenger” ribonucleic acid (mRNA).

mRNA is a single-stranded RNA produced from the DNA template during transcription. A truncated mRNA occurs when there is a partial degradation of full-length mRNAs or when there is a premature termination of transcription, a process of copying a segment of DNA into RNA. However, many scientists also say this is dishonest. They claim this is “modified” RNA.

What Impact Does the Truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccines Have on Humans?

The Pfizer mRNA sequence is 4,284 nucleotides in length and consists of a 5′ CAP structure. To understand how the truncated mRNA can impact a human, we must first understand the basics of genetic code, such as a codon and open reading frame.

A codon is a sequence of three nucleotides that form a unit of genetic code in DNA or RNA. An open reading frame is a DNA sequence between the start and stop codons, with the stop codon at the end of a translatable region.

Just like brakes are essential to a vehicle to prevent accidents, the stop codon works similarly. When there are premature stop codons in an mRNA, the protein of interest is incomplete and, therefore, not produced, leading to a truncated mRNA. 

However, if the truncated mRNA does not have a stop codon, it can be lethal to humans as the DNA may start producing highly toxic proteins.

Investigations Reveal Truncated mRNA in Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) evaluates and supervises pharmaceutical products in Europe. In its report titled “EMA/CHMP/448917/2021,” the agency requested Pfizer address specific issues about its COVID-19 vaccine, including the impurities in the product described as “truncated and modified mRNA.”

According to the assessment report, Pfizer had a deadline of July 2021 to meet, address the concerns raised by EMA, and provide the agency with monthly data on the potential of autoimmune conditions arising from truncated spike protein.

It is important to note that the EMA did not simply raise the concern, but in the report, it marked the Truncated mRNA as a primary objection, a formal regulatory red flag. These biological agents deployed by the pharmaceutical company targeted the entire globe without explaining the truncated mRNA.

By June 2022, a leaked photo of a meeting between the Pfizer officials and the EMA discussing the primary concern surfaced on Trial Site News. According to the EMA, the truncated mRNA needed to be sufficiently characterized, described, and investigated to determine whether it was the same across all batches of the mRNA vaccines.

Pfizer Acknowledges Truncated mRNA and Responds to EMA in an Official Meeting.

As evident from the leaked presentation slide, during the meeting, Pfizer and its officials acknowledged truncated mRNA in their mRNA vaccines. The officials responded that most of the truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines are 1,500 to 3,500 nucleotides long, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure without a Poly(A) tail and the stop codon.

Since DNA does not have a stop codon, there is no stop signal, meaning that the amino acid chain continues prolonging, which prolongs the mRNA spike protein. In the DNA sequence, if the spike protein takes over, it will lead to further spike proteins with multiple repeats since there is no stop codon. During this process, a different mRNA can take over; if that happens, the DNA sequence will create unknown proteins.

What’s fishy about all this is that when you download the EMA report titled “Type II group of the variations assessment report,” it is completely blacked out on page 17, table 2 Poly(A) content.

Researchers use the “western blot” method, an analytical technique for detecting specific proteins in a tissue homogenate or extract sample. This technique can help researchers analyze the size and count of the protein. 

The EMA requested that Pfizer-BioNTech submit experimental findings of their mRNA vaccines to show that they would not lead to fragmented protein. The EMA’s requirement is a basic requirement that pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers must address before humans can use the vaccines.

However, since this is the first time mRNA vaccines have been used across a large population, the quality issue is the first of its kind. There is uncertainty over any previous quality standard to help manage truncated mRNA.

To fulfill the bare minimum requirements of EMA, in December 2020, Pfizer provided them with digitized western blot figures that showed the levels of spike protein in their Covid-19 COVID-19 vaccines and suggested that no other proteins were produced. In a report published by the FDA, Pfizer stated that their COVID-19 vaccine protein is consistent with the expected size and comparable across all batches.

In 2021, Pfizer provided another digitized western blot figure showing that its COVID-19 vaccine did not produce proteins in vitro.

However, all the western plots provided are entirely digitized, raising further concerns about the results of their experimental findings.

Did Pfizer Provide Fake Western Blots?

Pfizer submitted many sets of western blots that could be fake. The proteins are different sizes and separate at various locations. Certain factors affect the appearance of western blots, including protein transfer speed, incubation duration, and antibody concentration. All of these suggest that Western blots cannot be perfect, and there will always be distortions.

Many of the Western blots provided by Pfizer seem too perfect. They appear spotlessly clean and perfectly rectangular. All the Western blots are noiseless and appear to be fake.

Why Did the EMA Approve the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines Despite Dangerous Components?

According to the EMA, further categorization is needed, but the lack of experimental data on truncated mRNA should not lead to any conclusions. 

At the end of the report, the EMA states that there are no longer any issues with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, and by December 12, 2020, the EMA gave Pfizer marketing authorization.

Several questions arise from the EMA’s conclusion over Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines. How did Pfizer resolve the issues raised by the EMA? Did the pharmaceutical company provide them with fake Western blots and receive an approval nod? Did the counterfeit reports manage to get the support of the regulatory body? Does the EMA know the reports are fake, yet have they given the vaccine manufacturer the approval nod? How did this get under the FDA’s Radar, or do they not care?

Are All Covid-19 Approved Vaccines mRNA?

Although researchers have studied mRNA for decades, during the pandemic, it was the first time they used it to create a vaccine. Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are mRNA vaccines, while others use different technologies. Novavax created its vaccine using a process similar to developing a flu vaccine.

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of the only mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, in the United States.

Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Ingredients

The following is the breakdown of the ingredients used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine:

• Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) instructs the body to create a form of protein from the COVID-19 virus. Although the Johnson vaccine is not mRNA, it also instructs the body to form protein from the COVID-19 virus by entering human cells using the DNA stored inside a modified vector virus.
• Lipids are a broad group of organic compounds that are fatty acids. The following are some of the lipids used to create Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: 2[(polyethylene glycol (PEG))-2000]-N, N-di tetradecyl acetamide
• 1,2-stearoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine
• Cholesterol (plant-derived)
• ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)
• Salt: Sodium chloride, a form of salt, and other salts are essential to the human body as it helps maintain fluid levels. It also aids in the stability of the Covid-19 vaccine. The following are the different types of salt used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: Potassium chloride
• Monobasic potassium phosphate
• Sodium chloride
• Dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
• Other ingredients, including sugar, help maintain the vaccine’s stability and keep the molecule in shape.

Other brand vaccines also use citric acid monohydrate (Johnson & Johnson), acetic acid (Moderna vaccines), and ethanol.

Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Triggers a Severe Allergic Reaction

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 20 cases of severe allergic reactions were recovered or discharged home. Many scientists believe that the compound polyethylene glycol in the messenger RNA is causing a rare form of allergic reaction in some people who have taken the Pfizer vaccine.

Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a component in some drugs, it was never used to create a vaccine. The compound has occasionally resulted in anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction of the immune system, the body’s natural defense system, overreacting to a trigger. Scientists believe that people with high levels of PEG have an increased risk of anaphylactic reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Could Pfizer End up in Trouble with Their Covid-19 Vaccines?

Vaccine manufacturers have immunity against legal actions for any injuries caused by their vaccine. It is important to note that pandemics like COVID-19 arrive unexpectedly, and vaccine manufacturers do not have much time to experiment and carry out human trials, so they receive immunity against legal action if their vaccines cause injuries.

However, immunity does not extend to vaccine manufacturers’ negligence. If Pfizer knows its COVID-19 vaccines are impure and intentionally provides fake reports to receive market authorization, it could be in hot water.

Further investigation can help reveal the depth of the situation and the damage the pharmaceutical company has done with their truncated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on a global scale. The problem is that Pfizer seems to be controlling the messaging with billions of dollars in ad money. Why would a journalist who wants to keep their job report anything negative, even if it’s true?