Pfizer Allowed Dangerous Components in Its Vaccines – Is FDA Asleep?
Did you know that many NIH scientists promoting mRNA receive a royalty kickback from the pharmaceutical industry? In law, we call this a conflict of interest. To this day, Doctor Anthony Fauci refuses to tell the American people how much he received in royalty payments to push two years of economic lockdowns on the American people. Although he claims to donate them to charity, almost every celebrity donates to their OWN charities.
So why all the hush-hush? Sadly, investigative journalism appears to be dead. Only so-called “conspiracy theorists” seem to be covering the truth about the multiple convicted criminal felon pharma company Pfizer and others. Did you also know that several directors of the CDC are aligned with Bill Gates and other population control advocates? Did you know that many CDC and FDA heads worked for or got cushy jobs with BIG PHARMA after leaving their government positions? Do you think this is a problem?
I am attorney Michael Ehline. I am not “anti-vax.” In fact, mRNA does not inoculate as the Polio Vaccine did. In fact, the government changed the legal definition of vaccine once this fact came to light, and the lapdog press said it’s totally normal to change the definition. My mother-in-law died of Thrombosis (a known side effect of the emergency use “vaccines”) after being injected with the Moderna “vaccine.”
For-profit media and Silicon Valley receive billions in advertising money in ad spend from Pfizer and other billion-dollar medical corporations; the current US Administration (FDA, CDC pharma Axis) appears to be a revolving door for Big Pharma heads. Our personal injury attorneys have done extensive research so as to present both sides of the mRNA story.
A recent investigation into the mRNA vaccine quality issues revealed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains Truncated mRNA, and their negligence could have far greater repercussions than we are led to believe. Let’s explore the details of the investigation with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.
What Is Truncated mRNA?
Between the genetic code in our DNA that consists of nucleotides and the protein it produces that consists of amino acids, there is a bridge molecule referred to as translator or the “messenger” ribonucleic acid (mRNA).
The mRNA is a single-stranded RNA produced from the DNA template during transcription. A truncated mRNA occurs when there is a partial degradation of full-length mRNAs or when there is a premature termination of transcription, a process of copying a segment of DNA into RNA. However, many scientists say this is dishonest as well. They claim this is “modified” RNA.
What Impact Does the Truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccines Have on Humans?
The Pfizer mRNA sequence is 4,284 nucleotides in length, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure. To understand how the truncated mRNA can impact a human, we must first understand the basics of genetic code, such as a codon and open reading frame.
A codon is a sequence of three nucleotides that together form a unit of genetic code in a DNA or RNA. An open reading frame is a DNA sequence between the start and stop codons, with the stop codon at the end of a translatable region.
Just like brakes are essential to a vehicle to prevent accidents, the stop codon works similarly. When there are premature stop codons in an mRNA, the protein of interest is incomplete and, therefore, not produced, leading to a truncated mRNA.
However, if the truncated mRNA does not have a stop codon, it can be lethal to humans as the DNA may start producing highly toxic proteins.
Investigations Reveal Truncated mRNA in Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is a European agency in charge of evaluating and supervising pharmaceutical products in Europe. In its report titled “EMA/CHMP/448917/2021”, the agency requested Pfizer to address specific issues about their COVID-19 vaccine, including the impurities in the product described by the agency as “truncated and modified mRNA.”
According to the assessment report, Pfizer had a deadline of July 2021 to meet to address the concerns raised by EMA and provide the agency with monthly data on the potential of autoimmune conditions arising from truncated spike protein.
It is important to note that the EMA did not simply raise the concern, but in the report, it marked the Truncated mRNA as a major objection, which is a formal regulatory red flag. These biological agents deployed by the pharmaceutical company targeted the entire globe without any explanation for the truncated mRNA.
By June 2022, a leaked photo of a meeting between the Pfizer officials and the EMA discussing the major concern surfaced on Trial Site News. According to the EMA, there was a need for sufficiently characterizing the truncated mRNA, describing it, and investigating whether it was the same across all batches of the mRNA vaccines.
Pfizer Acknowledges Truncated mRNA and Responds to EMA in an Official Meeting
During the meeting, as evident from the leaked presentation slide, Pfizer and their officials acknowledged truncated mRNA in their mRNA vaccines. The officials responded that most of the truncated mRNA in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines are 1,500 to 3,500 nucleotides long, consisting of a 5′ CAP structure without a Poly(A) tail and the stop codon.
Since the DNA does not have a stop codon, there is no stop signal meaning that the amino acid chain continues prolongation, which prolongs the mRNA spike protein. In the DNA sequence, if the spike protein takes over, it will lead to further spike protein with multiple repeats since there is no stop codon. During this process, a different mRNA can take over; if that happens, the DNA sequence will create unknown proteins.
What’s fishy about all this is that when you download the EMA report titled “Type II group of the variations assessment report,” on page 17, table 2 Poly(A) content, it is completely blacked out.
Researchers use the “western blot” method, an analytical technique to detect specific proteins in a tissue homogenate or extract sample. It can help researchers analyze the size and count of the protein.
The EMA requested Pfizer-BioNTech to submit experimental findings of their mRNA vaccines to show that they would not lead to fragmented protein. This requirement by the EMA is a basic requirement that pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers must address before humans can use the vaccines.
However, since this is the first time using mRNA vaccines across a large population, the quality issue is the first of its kind. There is uncertainty over any previous quality standard to help manage truncated mRNA.
To fulfill the bare minimum requirements of EMA, in December 2020, Pfizer provided them with digitized western blot figures that showed the levels of spike protein in their Covid-19 COVID-19 vaccines and suggested that no other proteins were produced. In a report published by FDA, Pfizer stated that their COVID-19 vaccine protein is consistent with the expected size and comparable across all batches.
In 2021, Pfizer provided another digitized western blot figure that showed that their COVID-19 vaccine did not produce proteins in vitro.
However, all the western plots provided are entirely digitized, raising further concerns over their experimental findings’ results.
Did Pfizer Provide Fake Western Blots?
Pfizer submitted many sets of western blots which could be fake. The proteins have different sizes, and they separate at various locations. There are certain factors that affect the appearance of western blots, including protein transfer speed, incubation duration, and antibody concentration. All of these suggest that western blots cannot be perfect, and there will always be distortions.
Many western blots provided by Pfizer seem too perfect, and they appear spotlessly clean and perfectly rectangular. All the Western blots are noiseless and appear to be fake.
Why Did the EMA Approve the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines Despite Dangerous Components?
According to the EMA, there is a need for further categorization, but the lack of experimental data on truncated mRNA should not lead to any conclusions.
At the end of the report, the EMA states that there are no longer any issues with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, and by December 12, 2020, the EMA gave Pfizer marketing authorization.
Several questions arise from the EMA’s conclusion over Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines. How did Pfizer resolve the issues raised by the EMA? Did the pharmaceutical company provide them with fake Western blots and receive an approval nod? Did the counterfeit reports manage to get the support of the regulatory body? Does the EMA know the reports are fake yet give the vaccine manufacturer the approval nod? How did this get under FDA’s Radar, or do they not care?
Are All Covid-19 Approved Vaccines mRNA?
Although researchers have studied mRNA for decades, during the pandemic, it was the first time they ever got to use it to create a vaccine. Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are mRNA vaccines, while others use different technologies, with Novavax creating their vaccine using a process similar to developing a flu vaccine.
The US Food and Drug Administration has approved using the only mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, in the United States.
Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Ingredients
The following is the breakdown of the ingredients used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine:
- Messenger ribonucleic acid: mRNA provides instructions to the body to create a form of protein from the Covid-19 virus. Although the Johnson vaccine is not mRNA, it also instructs the body to form protein from the COVID-19 virus by entering the human cells using the DNA stored inside a modified vector virus.
- Lipids: are a broad group of organic compounds that are fatty acids. The following are some of the lipids used to create Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: 2[(polyethylene glycol (PEG))-2000]-N, N-di tetradecyl acetamide
- Cholesterol (plant-derived)
- Salt: Sodium chloride, a form of salt, and other salts are essential to the human body as it helps maintain fluid levels. It also aids in the stability of the Covid-19 vaccine. The following are the different types of salt used in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines: Potassium chloride
- Monobasic potassium phosphate
- Sodium chloride
- Dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
- Other ingredients, including sugar, help maintain the vaccine’s stability and keep the molecule in shape.
Other brand vaccines also use citric acid monohydrate (Johnson & Johnson), acetic acid (Moderna vaccines), and ethanol.
Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Triggers a Severe Allergic Reaction
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 20 cases of severe allergic reactions were recovered or discharged home. Many scientists believe that the compound polyethylene glycol in the messenger RNA is causing a rare form of allergic reaction in some people who have taken the Pfizer vaccine.
Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a component in some drugs, it was never used to create a vaccine. The compound has occasionally resulted in anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction of the immune system, the body’s natural defense system, overreacting to a trigger. Scientists believe that people with high levels of PEG have an increased risk of anaphylactic reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
Could Pfizer End up in Trouble with Their Covid-19 Vaccines?
Vaccine manufacturers have immunity against legal actions for any injuries caused by their vaccine. It is important to note that pandemics like COVID-19 arrive unexpectedly, and vaccine manufacturers do not have much time to experiment and carry out human trials, so they receive immunity against legal action if their vaccines cause injuries.
However, the immunity does not extend to the negligence carried out by vaccine manufacturers. If Pfizer knows their COVID-19 vaccines are impure and intentionally provides fake reports to receive market authorization, it could put them in hot waters.
Further investigation can help reveal the depth of the situation and the damage the pharmaceutical company has done with their truncated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on a global scale. The problem is that Pfizer seems to control the messaging with billions in ad money. Why would a journalist who wants to keep their job report anything negative, even if it’s true?