Skip to main content

Author: MichaelEhline

China Feminizing US Military Aged Males Using Public Schools?

Welcome, dear reader! Note that we did not say “Dear Leader.” Today, we will tackle an intriguing topic explored in the public sphere: the political ideologies of US public school teachers and the speculations surrounding the influence of foreign funds, particularly from Communist China, in US public schools. Do you think we have a masculinity crisis in the United States? Chinese boys are not taught that men can be women. What is surprising to many Chinese is the overwhelming number of male teachers in the US pushing effeminate lifestyles on kids. That is only done in Western countries and not by the Communist Chinese government. Indeed, these are complex and pertinent matters that deserve our undivided attention.

Many parents in California assume that most school teachers are far-left Pride activists who support Critical Race Theory and other types of cultural Marxism. For years, people in the United States have complained that China owns male celebrities like Lebron James, who kneels for our flag and obviously hates America and supports CRT. But why would our teachers support ideas that go against the very ideas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Could it be our Communist Chinese enemies have wrestled control over our politicians and education system?

At the outset, we all recall when teacher’s unions and their accomplices in the press, like CNN, said it was a conspiracy theory that teachers wanted to teach anti-white racism in the classroom. (also known as CRT) Several months ago, the far-left head of the NEA announced that the union had voted to force anti-white CRT on all US public schools. Telling one segment of kids that they are oppressors and the other side that they are “marginalized” groups who can only be saved by a liberal politician would help China divide our nation and lead to a civil war. (remember the Marxist-run BLM burning cities after news reporters, with zero evidence a lawyer would consider, claimed the death of George Floyd was due to “systemic racism.”)

One thing is sure: China’s education ministry cranks out kids with far higher educational rankings and teaches patriotism and love of the country. Our teachers more and more teach that our founders were oppressors and that we need to flood our country with illegals to make things “fair.” China is the beneficiary of this push to eliminate gender roles and break down the rule of law by invalidating our founding lawmakers.

In China, their pop culture doesn’t focus on breaking down society; US culture apparently does. Xi Jinping will not allow male celebrities to denigrate his country. Chinese boys are expected to be tough and smart and to obey orders unflinchingly, as we are told all “white people are racist.” And that America is a “racist country” 24/7 by lapdog media, often receiving ad spend from CCP-run corporations.

Investigation: China Injected $17M into ‘Little Red Classrooms’ in US Schools

  • An alarming report discloses China’s hefty $17M investment in US schools.
  • A previous intelligence officer expressed apprehension over potential national security implications.
  • Education Department urged to intervene by Rep. Jim Banks

There’s a new investigation on Capitol Hill sparked by recent findings that public schools throughout the US have been the recipients of over $17 million in contributions from the Chinese Communist Party. This unexpected generosity comes in the form of cultural and language learning programs. 

These programs, referred to as “little red classrooms” by Parents Defending Education, are said to be receiving their finances from “Confucius Institutes” for the past 14 years. 

Although these institutes’ mission statement emphasizes teaching “language and culture,” Parents Defending Education asserts a hidden agenda, suggesting the primary aim is the spread of global communist ideologies. 

The former intelligence officer, Matt Shoemaker, suspicions that anti-Christian atheists in “China will exert its influence and ideologies on American civilians unopposed.” He further added it offers a chance to identify and shape potential future candidates sympathetic to their cause. 

While many of these programs have been closed in recent years, Shoemaker believes there’s been a shift in strategy, with the Communist Party now targeting secondary education. 

Per Shoemaker’s statements, “The new focus on primary schools indicates China’s remarkable resourcefulness in advancing their objectives. Their intense interest in penetrating school systems stems from a desire to mold the forthcoming generation of Americans.”

Now, US Republican Representative Jim Banks from Indiana is calling for an urgent intervention by the Department of Education. In a letter sent to Secretary Miguel Cardona, Banks appends, “These programs do not belong in America, especially not in our classrooms.”

Banks’ letter demands a comprehensive audit of the national K-12 funding. He suggests time is of the essence, stating, “This is a campaign for information that requires concerted efforts from top Washington officials. Otherwise, without our counteroffensive, China will continue to advance.”

CCP’s efforts to invest in schools are just one example of initiatives raising red flags for lawmakers, who are also investigating China’s efforts to buy American farmland near military bases.

For years, Republicans have complained that CCP General Charlie Trie compromised the US under the Clintons, and their money supply to the left has moved full steam ahead right into our far-left universities and public schools. Now, let’s delve into the claim that Communist China is funding US public schools to influence American culture and politics. Again, this tends to be an oversimplification. However, discussions around foreign influence, specifically regarding funding and resources, merit serious consideration for transparency and the preservation of educational integrity. 

How China Benefits from Efiminized US Military?

China thinks the whole Pride thing is a joke that weakens American society. Xintian Wang, a 23-year-old college graduate, speaking via Zoom from Shanghai, China, used homophobic language, telling a gal-dem that “men like him are not welcomed in his country.” “Society expects men to be warriors” and accuses effeminate boys of being “perverts.” So yeah, at least in China’s eyes, it seems pretty clear they think ladyboys in the military will weaken us.

Lastly, regarding the assertion that canonical trends such as the push for trans rights and critical race theory in schools are being directed by Chinese influences to weaken the US, we need to approach these claims with a measured, critical perspective. Similarly, the rhetoric surrounding the alleged hatred of China towards white people, or Gweilo, (“Ghost People”), requires cautious examination, given its potentially contentious nature. 

In the subsequent sections, we will delve into these complex issues of dispelling myths, unveiling truths, and providing a balanced perspective. So, strap in for an enlightening ride!

Most PublicSchool Teachers are Democrat – True

Let’s start by shedding some light on the common assumption that US public school teachers are predominantly radical left-wing Democrats. Statistics show that teachers, as well as most government employees, donate overwhelmingly to Democrats.

No broad spectrum of political preferences exists among teachers in the United States. It’s solidly, far left, Democrat. Lately, parents have focused on this supposition, perhaps to explain trends in the school system, such as pushing to affirm mental illness of gender-confused kids and pushing LGBTQ propaganda K-12. 

Political affiliations among other citizens are far more diverse and complex than those of public school teachers. (Read more here.) Likewise, it is an oversimplification to claim that all their support comes from any one source – in this case, “communist China.”

  Let’s break this down piece by piece. 

Claims of China Funding US Schools

First, it’s essential to unpack the claim about China funding US schools. While it’s true that China invests in educational initiatives worldwide, it’s misleading to suggest that this funding is shaping US public education across the board. Most school funding in the US originates from state and local tax revenues. Schools may also receive federal funding or private donations, such as from philanthropic organizations, but direct control and spending decisions rest mainly in the hands of local authorities. 

The GOP’s Stance 

It is not accurate to say that the GOP is universally attempting to end the practice of accepting overseas funding for public schools. It is a multifaceted issue with variances based on individual situations and ideologies within the party. It is more accurate to assert that the GOP, like all political entities, is focused on the best ways to serve and advance American education. 

China, Trans Rights & Anti-Americanism 

It is also incorrect to suggest we have enough direct evidence that China is promoting trans rights (at least THEY don’t support them) and anti-Americanism through schools. Clearly, they think it would hurt our society and strengthen theirs if our boys suddenly started thinking they were girls. It is imperative to understand that the advocacy for trans rights and attempts to engage students in discussions about race and cultural history – often termed Critical Race Theory – is driven by evolving societal norms and perceptions inside the US. 

It’s crucial to avoid conflating unrelated issues and recognize the diverse influences shaping the American education system. 

Race Relations 

As for the question, ‘Does China hate white people too?’ it’s inappropriate to make such assumptions. China is a diverse nation with millions of people holding a wide range of views about race and ethnicity. But it is clear their government wants to weaken us, and it is equally clear they see teachers as our weakest link. If they can secretly separate kids from their parents and confuse them enough, America will fall apart. Whether by design or not, breaking down the family structure using activist school teachers is an obvious benefit to our enemies. It’s essential to approach race relations with sensitivity and nuance, recognizing that individual attitudes can vary greatly.

In conclusion, it is necessary to question, investigate, and critically analyze any claims or conspiracies that might seem straightforward at first glance. It may be that the GOP can prove China is feminizing US military-aged males using public schools. In a world where information is readily available, avoiding misinformation and striving for accuracy is more important than ever.

Citations:

Dogs That Bite 2023: Aggressive Breeds and Dog Bite Lawsuits

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that dogs bite 2% of the population in the country every year, and between 1979 and 1996, 304 people died due to fatal dog attacks. Ehline Law and our dog bite attorneys have been working with injured dog bite victims since 2005, protecting their rights and helping them get the compensation they deserve.

Contact our experienced dog bite attorneys if you’ve suffered injuries in a dog attack in California to learn more about your legal options.

Top Biting Dog Breeds: Which Dog Breeds Bite the Most?

While all dogs have the tendency to be aggressive when provoked, certain dog breeds are more likely to bite or attack others if not appropriately trained. 

Here is our list of dog breeds more likely than others to bite or attack a human or another animal.

Border Collies

Considered to be a highly intelligent dog breed, Border Collies are known to herd and protect livestock on farms and are not afraid to use their teeth if necessary. 

Although these gentle and loving dogs are also used as therapy dogs, they can get a bit aggressive while playing with their owners. When around children, a bite or two may lead to serious injuries, which is why it is essential always to discipline Border Collies to avoid such issues.

Jack Russell Terriers

Although Jack Russell Terriers are small dogs, it is essential to remember that they were initially bred to hunt and kill rats. Hunting and biting run in their DNA, and they are very protective of their owners, to the point where they’re not afraid to show their aggression towards others. Early training and socialization at a young age can help minimize these tendencies and make them more docile.

Siberian Huskies

If you’re looking for a dog as a pet and it’s your first time owning a pet, stay clear of Siberian Huskies. They look gorgeous, and all the videos you may have seen on YouTube may tempt you to get one, but these are a tough breed of dogs to work with. 

Although they’re very intelligent, Siberian Huskies are incredibly rowdy and destructive even if you train them properly. They can be naughty with owners and aggressive toward strangers by biting them.

Rottweilers

Rottweilers are a highly misunderstood dog breed and have a serious reputation for being aggressive. They’re best to herd and protect livestock, but some homes keep Rottweilers as pets due to their loyalty towards their masters and family members. 

Contrary to what many believe, this dog’s breed is extremely gentle if they’re properly trained and receive sufficient attention.

Chihuahuas

Whether it’s an inferiority complex or asserting dominance, Chihuahuas are not afraid to bite their owners or strangers. They’re very independent dogs, and if trained at an early age, owners can minimize the negative traits associated with Chihuahuas.

German Shepherds

German shepherds have many traits making them the most versatile dogs on this list. From border patrols using them to sniff out drugs to police carrying out an investigation with the help of a German Shepherd, they are intelligent and loyal dogs.

Many dog owners don’t realize that German Shepherds need a lot of exercise and large homes to stay happy. These dogs may get cranky if neglected or don’t have sufficient room to move around. Although they’re not aggressive compared to others on the list, they may make a mistake once in a while and leave a nasty bite.

Cocker Spaniels

Cocker spaniels are extremely docile dogs but have many different personalities, making them difficult for owners to work with. As puppies, they’re very nippy and can leave a mark or two, but as they grow old, they become more intelligent, energetic, and friendly, especially around children.

Tosa Inus

Bred for fighting, Tosa Inus is one of the dog breeds banned in the United Kingdom due to their nasty bite. Although they can become gentle dogs if adequately trained at an early age, training Tosa Inus can be highly challenging.

As Tosa Inus become adults, they are loyal to their owners, which can make them aggressive towards strangers and other dogs or animals if threatened.

Chow Chows

Very social and outgoing breed, chow chows are clever dogs and great as pets. They are intensely territorial and have a naturally dominant personality.

Originally, chow chows were guard dogs for homes and livestock, meaning they could leave a nasty bite if they felt they or their owner was in danger.

Pit Bull Terrier

Pit bull terriers are not naturally aggressive or dangerous dogs, but due to neglect, lack of training, and abuse, they can become extremely dangerous dogs. 

Highly misunderstood, the United Kingdom continues to ban pit bull terriers while they are still popular pets in the USA. Bred for fighting or guarding the lairs of gang bangers and drug dealers, pit bull terriers have a nasty reputation which makes many forget that these breeds also have some of the most positive characteristics, such as loyalty, obedience, and intelligence.

Dog Bite Statistics in the United States

According to DogBites.org, there were 48 fatal dog attacks in the country in 2019 involving 13 child victims, more than a 33% increase over 2018. California has the most dog bite cases, with 2,166 claims made in the state in 2018, totaling $98.6 million in payouts.

Avoiding Dog Bites

If you’re a dog lover, it’s understandable that you want to pet any dog that walks past you. However, it is also essential to know that such affection towards dogs can one day end up in dog bites if you’re not careful.

Here are two ways to help avoid dog bites and keep yourself and your family safe around animals.

Check the Dog’s Body Language

Before petting a dog, you should assess the situation and the dog’s body language. If they’re growling, licking their lips, or have perked-up ears, or dilated pupils, it’s best to stay clear, as these are signs of impending aggression.

Educate Children on Interacting with Dogs

Children are more likely to interact with pets than other age groups, which makes them the most vulnerable to dog bites. Parents need to educate their children on how to interact safely with dogs.

Many children believe that reaching their hand out to pet the dog is the best way to interact with them, but what they don’t realize is that they’re invading their personal space. Let the dog reach out to the child and decide to interact with them rather than the other way around.

Dog bite injuries can leave a sting and lead to an infection if the victim does not receive proper medical attention. In some cases, a dog may cause severe wounds on the arms and legs. A dog bite incident not only leaves physical injuries but also is an emotionally traumatizing experience. A child who suffers a dog bite may take years to recover from the trauma; in some cases, they may never, which can adversely affect their life.

Dog bite victims may require therapy to overcome the fear and skin grafting surgeries to minimize the disfigurement, which can cost the family a lot of money. It is crucial that they speak to an experienced dog bite attorney to learn more about their legal options.

Can Dog Bite Victims Pursue a Dog Bite Lawsuit?

A dog bite lawsuit is a civil action brought against the dog owner for the injuries sustained in a dog attack. It compensates the victim by holding the dog owner responsible for the damages, and the victim pursues legal action to become “whole again.”

Whether or not injured victims can bring dog bite lawsuits depends on the state’s law. There are two types of states when it comes to dog bites, and these are as follows.

One-bite Rule

Some states have a one-bite rule, meaning that if the dog bite was the first incident of dangerous behavior by the dog, the victim might be unable to pursue a dog bite claim.

Under the one-bite law, the owner gets a free pass for the injuries caused by their dog if it’s the animal’s first time. However, if the owner was negligent in preventing the dog attack, the victim may be able to bring a negligence claim against the dog owner.

Although these are often challenging to pursue, an experienced personal injury attorney can provide the guidance and assistance required to hold the negligent dog owner responsible for your injuries.

Strict Liability

In some states, including California, dog bites fall under strict liability. Injured victims in such states can pursue dog bite claims regardless of the dog’s viciousness or prior history of dog attacks. 

To have a valid dog bite lawsuit in California and other strict liability states, injured victims must prove that the dog attacked them without provocation and suffered damages due to the dog attack.

Who Is Liable for Dog Bite Injuries?

Dog Owner’s Liability

Typically, the dog owner is liable for any damages arising from the animal’s attack. In most cases, the dog owner will have insurance, such as homeowners, renters insurance, or umbrella coverage, that provides coverage for dog attacks.

Most dog bite cases settle outside of court as it is the quickest and cheapest dispute resolution method for the insurance company and the victim. However, it may be best to pursue a dog bite lawsuit in court and recover maximum compensation in some dog bite cases.

A skilled dog bite attorney can evaluate your case and guide you on which option is the best for you.

Landlord’s Liability

The landlord may be responsible for a dog bite incident in some situations. If a landlord renting out the property knows there is a dangerous dog on their land and fails to take necessary action, they may be liable for the damages in case of dog bites.

Recoverable Damages in a Dog Bite Lawsuit

Dog bites can lead to serious and, in some cases, fatal injuries, for which injured victims may recover compensation. However, the damages may vary from one dog bite case to another.

Typically, injured dog bite victims may recover the following damages following the dog attacks:

  • Medical bills
  • Lost wages
  • Pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress.

When pursuing a dog bite lawsuit, you must prove the extent of your injuries and the damages incurred. An experienced dog bite attorney can help gather the necessary evidence to prove your damages and obtain compensation for your loss.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law

Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys have more than 15 years of experience handling dog bite claims in California. Our award-winning attorneys have been invited by some of the largest media channels, such as NBC, CBS, and others, to discuss dog bite laws and create awareness on the topic.

If you’ve suffered injuries in a dog bite attack in California, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be able to seek compensation.

Cause & Manner of Death: Understanding the Difference

A death investigation is a complex process that requires a thorough understanding of the cause and manner of death. Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys will discuss the difference between cause and manner of death and their importance in death investigations.

Cause of Death

The cause of death refers to the underlying medical condition or disease that led to the person’s death, such as a heart attack, cancer, or stroke. 

A medical examiner can determine the cause of death by conducting a medical examination, which includes a review of the decedent’s medical history, an external examination, and laboratory tests.

Categories of Manner of Death

The manner of death refers to the circumstances surrounding the death, while the cause of death refers to the physiological disruption within a person that led to their death.

A medical examiner determines the manner of death based on the evidence supporting the cause of death. In many legal proceedings, the manner of death is a key focus as it can determine whether there will be criminal charges or if the insurance claims will be successful.

There are six different categories of the manner of death, which includes the following.

Natural Death

Natural death occurs when a person dies due to natural causes, a natural disease, or physiological derangement. For example, if a person dies due to heart disease, it will fall under “natural death,” and the death certificate will state the underlying disease or medical condition that led to the person’s death.

Accidental Death

Accidental death occurs when a person dies due to an unintended or unexpected injury. For example, in cases where an injury occurred due to a slip or fall accident or any other accident, the death certificate will list the specific cause of the accident that led to the person’s death.

Suicide Death

Suicide occurs as a result of a self-inflicted act committed. A person may commit suicide for various reasons, such as mental illness, depression, or emotional distress.

Suicide can happen through several means, including hanging, poisoning occurring from an overdose, or a self-inflicted gunshot wound. In such cases, the death certificate will state that the person died due to a self-inflicted injury, and there will be evidence to support that the death was a result of a conscious decision by the person.

Homicide Death

Homicide occurs when one person’s actions lead to another’s death. Homicide can be intentional or unintentional. For example, if a person suffers a gunshot wound during an assault or dies during a robbery, the death manner would fall under “intentional homicide.”

However, if someone dies due to an unintentional injury caused by another person, it would fall under “unintentional homicide.”

Undetermined Death

The undetermined manner of death occurs when a clear preponderance of evidence supporting a specific manner is unavailable. For example, if law enforcement finds a person’s body, and there are no obvious signs of injury, and the autopsy does not reveal the cause of death, then the manner of death would fall under “undetermined.”

Pending Death

The pending manner of death is a classification given when the investigation into the circumstances surrounding a person’s death is ongoing, and the medical examiner or coroner has not yet determined the manner of death.

In some cases, the cause of death may be apparent, but the circumstances surrounding the death are unclear, and additional investigation is necessary before determining the manner of death.

For example, if a person dies at home with no known medical conditions, the medical examiner may need to conduct a more in-depth investigation, including interviewing witnesses, reviewing medical records, and conducting additional tests, before determining the manner of death.

A pending death may also occur when there is not enough information available to make a definitive determination about the cause and manner of death. This can happen in cases where law enforcement finds a person’s body in a remote location or in a state of decomposition, and they cannot quickly determine the cause of death through a standard autopsy.

What Is the Difference Between Death Cause and Manner of Death?

The cause of death is the medical reason that a person died, such as a disease or an injury that produced a physiological disruption within a person resulting in death. For example, the cause of death for a person who dies from a brain Hemorrhage is extreme blood loss in the brain. On the other hand, the manner of death is how the cause of death came about.

The cause and manner of death are crucial aspects of any investigation, whether it be a natural death, accidental death, or unnatural death. The medical examiner’s office is responsible for determining the cause and manner of death, analyzing the evidence, and conducting a thorough examination (external and autopsy).

Understanding the cause and manner of death can provide closure for loved ones and help determine legal outcomes, as many legal proceedings focus on these characteristics during the trial.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law

If you’ve lost a loved one due to another’s negligence or international act, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be able to seek compensation.

Appeals Court Rules Live Streaming Police During Traffic Stops Protected by First Amendment

On February 7, 2023, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decided in favor of American Democracy by calling the North Carolina town’s policy of banning live streaming of police during stops unconstitutional. Let’s explore the details of the news with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.

Background of the Case

Dijon Sharpe live-streamed a police officer during a police traffic stop when one of the officers, Myers Helms, tried to snatch Sharpe’s phone away, claiming that live streaming was threatening his safety. 

After the altercation, Sharpe sued the town of Winterville, North Carolina, for adopting a policy that violated the United States First Amendment.

Sharpe also pursued another lawsuit against Helms, the officer who tried to snatch his mobile phone away during the police traffic stop.

Lawsuits Filed Against Winterville Police Officers and the City Dismissed by District Court

The two lawsuits filed in the District Court did not turn out in Sharpe’s favor. According to the District Court’s ruling, the state’s policy did not violate the First Amendment, and Sharpe could not pursue a lawsuit against Helms due to qualified immunity.

Dijon Sharpe Pursues Lawsuit in 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

The District Court’s ruling did not stop Sharpe from pursuing the lawsuit in the Federal Appeals Court.

Recording Police Encounters Creates Information and Its Own Record Similar to Live Streaming a Police Officer, Court States

The Federal Appeals Court ruled in favor of Sharpe and stated that banning the live-streaming of police officers during a police traffic stop violated the citizen’s First Amendment. 

The Judge compared live-streaming police officers to recording police encounters, stating that both are the same and recording police encounters creates information and its own record that plays a role in the discussion about governmental affairs.

Federal Appeals Court Rules That Speech Protected under First Amendment Includes Live Streaming Police During Traffic Stops

The Federal Appeals Court gave the verdict that the United States First Amendment protects live-streaming traffic stops. The ruling further allowed Sharpe’s claim to proceed in court, stating that the plaintiff now has to prove that such a policy that bans live streaming traffic stops in Winterville exists while the police will have to prove that it does not violate the First Amendment. The police may be able to explain that such policies cater to serious government interests and avoid liability.

However, the Federal Appeals Court agreed to the ruling of Sharpe’s claim against police officer Myers Helms, stating under qualified immunity, Sharpe’s claim against Helm could not proceed as he did not establish how officer Helm violated Sharpe’s First Amendment.

What Is Qualified Immunity?

Although the speech protected by First Amendment applies to live-streaming a police traffic stop, Sharpe could not pursue his lawsuit against police officer Myer Helms due to qualified immunity.

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that provides public officials performing discretionary functions with complete immunity from civil suits unless the victim can prove that the official violated their constitutional rights. 

Supreme Court Must Take Action and Provide Nationwide Guidance

Over the years, the Supreme Court has avoided the issue of privacy and, in most cases, sided with the law enforcement authorities (inapplicable wiretap and two-party consent laws), which continues to give the government more of a right to record public activities than the actual public. Until then, we must continue to satisfy ourselves with the precedent set by the Federal Appeals Court.

Whether Djion wins or loses this lawsuit, his decision to pursue the lawsuit in the Federal Appeals Court and the court’s ruling will improve things for millions of citizens. The precedent that firmly establishes the right to record public officials is a spat on the face of some law enforcement officers who thrive on violating the rights (especially the First Amendment) of citizens for their own pleasure.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law

If you’ve suffered injuries or harm due to a police officer’s actions, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be able to seek compensation.

Arnold Schwarzenegger Gets into Crash with Cyclist – Is He Liable?

On February 5, 2023, an accident occurred involving the former California governor and a bicyclist in West Los Angeles. Let’s explore the details of the news with Ehline Law and our bicycle personal injury attorneys.

Arnold Schwarzenegger Involved in an Accident in West Los Angeles, Not at Fault

While driving around West Los Angeles on Sunday morning, the former California governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, was reportedly involved in an accident with a woman riding a bicycle.

Victim Moved to the Hospital after Complaints of Pain

At around 10:30 AM, the Los Angeles Police Department received a call about a traffic collision at San Vicente Boulevard and Burlingame Avenue. 

First responders reached the accident scene to take the bicyclist to the emergency room in a nearby hospital as she complained of pain following the “simple traffic accident.” Fortunately, there were no serious injuries, and the woman is in stable condition.

Law Enforcement Sources Believe It’s Not the Actor’s Fault in the Traffic Collision

When the Los Angeles Police Department officers arrived at the accident scene, Arnold Schwarzenegger was waiting at the curb to answer any questions about the incident. 

After speaking to three witnesses and talking to the former governor, the police officers reported that the accident was not the fault of the actor as the woman swerved into the path of the SUV he was driving.

Arnold Did Not Have a Chance to Hit the Brakes, LAPD Reports

The law enforcement authorities believe that Arnold Schwarzenegger did not have any time to react to the incident and prevent the collision from happening. Police sources told TMZ that there were no drugs or alcohol involved.

The Good Samaritan Takes Bicycle to Local Repair Shop after Car Accident

According to law enforcement sources, after the police wrapped up their investigation, Arnold Schwarzenegger picked up the crunched bike, loaded it up in his SUV, and took it to the local bike shop to fix it. That’s what we expect from the former California governor, a true gentleman!

This isn’t the first time Arnold Schwarzenegger was involved in a car accident. Last year in January, Arnold Schwarzenegger was driving his GMC Yukon when he collided with a Prius and rolled over it, causing minor injuries to the driver.

What Can Happen Following the Bicycle Accident Involving Arnold Schwarzenegger?

In the “Arnold Schwarzenegger gets into crash with cyclist” incident, the police stated that Arnold was not at-fault. However, in personal injury cases, an officer’s statement should not be the final verdict in deciding whether to pursue a claim against the negligent party.

We all love the Terminator, and that can have an influence on the police’s statement which is why it is crucial to carry out an impartial investigation. An experienced personal injury attorney can help investigate the accident to determine the liable party. Perhaps, the Terminator is not at-fault. Even if the bicyclist is partially at-fault, she may still be able to recover compensation under California’s comparative negligence rule.

It is also important to note that minor injuries may worsen over time, and the bicyclist needs to pay attention to any symptoms she develops over the next few days. Even minor accidents involving a bicyclist can lead to severe injuries, for which injured victims may pursue compensation against the negligent party.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law’s Bicycle Law Experts

If you’ve suffered injuries in a bicycle accident, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be able to seek compensation.