Skip to main content

French Court – Cows’ Health Affected by 4G Cell Phone Tower?

4G Cell Tower Injury?

Did a cell tower injure you?

Receive a Free Consultation Today!

The conclusion would be to surround the verdict on whether the cell phone tower impacts the cows’ health or milk production for 4G.

The Accusation by Frederic Salgues

Frédéric Salgues, a farmer in the nearby area where the 4G tower for cell phones, has made an accusation. He has accused the constantly deteriorating milk production and health of his cows of being all because of the 4G cell phone tower near his farm, where his cows are used for milk production.

Salgues added that all his cows are almost bones and skin due to the tower. It is highly agonizing for him because he has been taking care of his cows for a long time. Now, something of a tower for 4G signals is affecting their health, and he can do nothing but watch how his cows are losing weight and offering up subpar milk production since the antenna installation.

He added that the health of his cows is deteriorating every day, and seeing that makes him cry. He has openly blamed the cell phone 4G tower installed near his farm back in 2021. The cows’ health started to deteriorate ever since the tower installation.

Clermont-Ferrand Administrative Court is Taking Salgues Claims Seriously

Although the matter may not seem serious to many, one of the courts in southwestern France has heard Salgues’s call for help. Cow milk production has dropped significantly following the antenna installation. Clermont-Ferrand, the administrative court in France, listened to Salgues’s comments about the cow health concerns.

They are taking Salgues’ statement very seriously and have issued an order in favor of Salgues. The French court ordered the 4G antenna switched off over cow health, as others, including environmentalists, are complaining about this new 4G antenna technology. The court ordered the tower to shut down for two months to see the outcome.

The court has announced they will monitor how things turn out for Salgues’ farm in the next two months. They will strictly monitor the cows’ health to see if there is an improvement.

The Orders Issued by the Court

In the order, the court issued a statement suggesting they found the decision to proceed with a temporary cessation of the tower appropriate. The two-month cessation of the building and its antenna may unravel whether the antenna installation is the real cause of cows’ health concerns.

During this period, they will monitor the herd’s behavior and the dairy cows’ activities. They will also monitor the cows’ health to see if any improvement is being recorded. The judicial expert will supervise the entire process of recording data and presenting a well-organized report.

One of the Monaco-based English-language news outlets, The Connexion, has covered the entire matter since milk production dropped.

Salgues Confirmed How his Farm is Affected

The court noted significant highlights from Salgues’ statement surrounding the matter, including the high number of deaths due to abnormal causes and voluntary de-nutrition by the herd.

The court also noted a serious disruption in the herd’s behavior and Salgues’s claim regarding the deterioration in the production, quantity, and quality of the milk.

In his statement, Salgues added that his cows hardly drink water. They don’t even get up at night to eat, making them seriously thin. He expanded on his cow health concerns, saying he feels that his cows are feeling sad. He’s hoping the French court orders, the 4 G antenna switch off over cow health, and public attention will save his dairy farm.

Yannick Supported Salgues’ Claims

Yannick, a fellow farmer, and brother of Salgues, backed his brother’s claims. He stated that it is their daily practice to document the milk’s quality, quantity, and production. Since the tower was installed, they have started recording a dip in all three factors.

He confirmed that, in the eleven months since the tower was installed, they have lost 40 cattle. Yannick claimed that under normal circumstances, the death rate of the cattle would only be around 9 or 10.

Defense lawyers for Bouygues Telecom, the mobile operators shut down by the ruling, stated there are:
“no scientific evidence” linking animal health and electromagnetic fields around mobile phone antennas. Yet, here, 40 of his 200 cows had died since the cell tower went active, according to the farmer. This ruling could also affect the rollout of even faster 5G antenna towers in France.

Are You Interested In Suing For 4-G or 5-G Illnesses?

We are interested in hearing about your case. Our serious injury attorneys have won millions on behalf of consumers, and we want to know about cell phone tower diseases and illnesses. Call us today at (213) 596-9642 to learn more.

Johnson & Johnson Recalls Five of its Aerosol Sunscreens

Johnson & Johnson Recalls Five of its Aerosol Sunscreens

Johnson & Johnson has recalled five of its aerosol sunscreens distributed nationwide after discovering benzene, a carcinogen, in some samples designed for consumers sun protection measures. Johnson & Johnson announced consumers should stop using the affected canisters immediately and seek refunds where possible. This is not Johnson & Johnson’s first recall in their supply chain this year, as it also recalled children’s Tylenol products due to potential contamination with mold.

A human carcinogen is a substance that promotes the development of cancer. Some carcinogens are artificial, such as benzene, found in Johnson & Johnson’s specific aerosol sunscreen products.

Benzones are also considered carcinogenic because long-term exposure may lead to leukemia and other cancers like colorectal tumors. Johnson & Johnson’s recalls were prompted by trace amounts of benzene being detected through its quality control process.

What is a Carcinogen?

Is This Johnson & Johnson’s First Recall?

No, Johnson & Johnson has a history of recalls. In November 2018, Johnson & Johnson recalled three products:

  • Tylenol Arthritis Pain Extra Strength Caplet bottle because the tablets may be chipped or broken and therefore difficult to swallow
  • Motrin Infant Drops because some bottles might have dropper tips that don’t work properly
  • Benadryl Allergy Relief Children’s Syrup due to reports from consumers who tasted metal in product samples.

What is Benzene?

Benzene is an organic compound with two benzene rings linked at one end (C^), and it is used as a solvent for other substances, including rubber, paint, ink, plastics, and textiles. Scientists discovered it by accident in 1825 when they distilled coal tar.

Benzene is an irritant that can be toxic if inhaled or swallowed because it enters the bloodstream directly from the lungs and intestines. It has been found to cause cancer of the bladder, bone marrow (leukemia), eye sockets, kidneys, liver, and skin in animals and people who regularly work with benzene.

What Are Neutrogena and Aveeno Products Included In Johnson & Johnson’s Sunscreen Recall?

Johnson & Johnson’s sunscreen affected products by the benzene recall are as follows:

  • Neutrogena Beach Defense Aerosol Sunscreen
  • Neutrogena Cool Dry Sport Aerosol Sunscreen
  • Neutrogena Invisible Daily Defense Aerosol Sunscreen
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Aerosol Sunscreen
  • Aveeno Protect + Refresh Aerosol Sunscreen

Johnson Johnson Sunscreen Recalls

What are the adverse health consequences of using Johnson Johnson Sunscreen Recall Products Containing Benzene?

Benzene is an organic compound found in the air due to incomplete combustion, such as cigarette smoke. It is also used to make other chemicals, including plastics, glues, or paints.

When benzene enters the body, it harms nearly every organ system – eyes (ocular), sockets, kidneys, liver, and skin- in animals and people who work with benzene regularly.

The effects include blood disorders, leukemia, or cancer of the lymphatic system; high levels may cause bone marrow death leading to aplastic anemia; lung damage from hypersensitivity pneumonitis or chemical pneumonia, where inflammation causes fluid accumulation around the lungs, which restricts breathing.

What Are The Symptoms Of Benzene Poisoning?

According to Johnson & Johnson officials, there have been no known cases in which someone has exhibited symptoms from using these recalled aerosol sunscreen product lines.

The company advises consumers who purchased any five impacted items should immediately stop using them and contact their physician if they experience adverse health consequences, such as skin irritation or burns resulting from this recall.

Symptoms of benzene poisoning include:

  • Headache
  • Dizziness or lightheadedness, sometimes with nausea and vomiting
  • Irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat.
  • Chronic exposure can lead to a gradual decline in liver function leading to jaundice (yellowing), enlarged veins on the skin (spider nevi), and enlargement of fatty tissue around the heart.

Symptoms may take months or years before they show up after repeated exposures. Continued prolonged exposure can, over time, result in leukemia (cancer). There is no known safe level for benzene.

What Are They Symptoms Of Benzene Poisoning

What Do I Do If I’ve Used Johnson & Johnson Aerosol Sunscreen Products?

Contact your local retailer for further instructions on how to return the sunscreen products, where they were purchased, and when. If you suspect you have symptoms from certain aerosol-recalled sunscreen products by Johnson & Johnson, you should see your physician.

According to The Food & Drug Administration:

“adverse reactions or quality problems experienced with the use of this product may be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program either online, by regular mail or by fax.”

  • Complete and submit the report Online
  • Regular Mail or Fax: Download form or call 1-800-332-1088 to request a reporting form, then complete and return to the address on the pre-addressed form, or submit by fax to 1-800-FDA-0178.

Is My Health At Risk If I Used Any Of J&J Aveeno or One of the Four Neutrogena Sunscreen Versions?

It is difficult to say if you are at risk for adverse reactions or quality problems. If your health concerns have increased, please see a physician. The FDA recommends that all consumers stop using certain aerosol sunscreen products and contact Johnson & Johnson with any questions about their use.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated in an email interview:

If someone had used one of the recalled J&J Aveeno or Neutrogena spray-on beach defense aerosol sunscreen products over the past few days then yes, it would be reasonable to consult your healthcare provider.

If I’ve Been Using J&J Recalled Products, Should I Contact An Attorney?

If you have been injured or sickened due to daily exposure to Johnson & Johnson consumer recalled product, contact Ehline Law as soon as possible for help recovering damages and compensation.

How Glyphosate Infiltrates Your Brain – You May Have a Legal Claim!

How Glyphosate Infiltrates Your Brain - You May Have a Legal Claim!

You May Have Legal Claims!

Ultimate Guide to Understanding Glyphosate Exposure. For decades, people have known herbicides as environmental contaminants. However, only recently have consumers understood the adverse health effects pesticide exposure might have on humans. However, only recently have consumers understood the adverse health effects pesticide exposure might have on humans. The detrimental effects glyphosate exposure will cause are now proven by science. Commercial herbicides and home-use pesticides can lead to damaging outcomes, horrific in vitro changes, and other neurodegenerative disorders. The controversial Roundup weed killer raised concerns about an active ingredient, glyphosate, warranting the need to study the substance’s effects on human health.

Research published in 2022 by Arizona State University reported that glyphosate infiltrates the brain, suggesting potential adverse health effects for Roundup users. The study shows that glyphosate successfully crosses the blood-brain barrier, enters the human brain, and can even onset of Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia in a dose-dependent manner. Once inside, it enhances levels of a critical factor known as TNF-α. TNF-α TNF-α, which means tumor necrosis factor-alpha. When it does, we can help the victims. Ehline Law and our injury attorneys advocate for injured victims suffering from exposure to toxic substances, including Agent Orange, glyphosate-based herbicides, and other broad-spectrum herbicide problems like cell biology division in brain tissues.

We have recovered over $150 million in compensation and helped over 3,000 injured victims. If you’re experiencing health problems following herbicides, including Agent Orange, contact us to learn more about your brain tissue post-exposure rights.

Glyphosate and Its Link to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Glyphosate herbicide became popular in the early 2000s, becoming Monsanto’s best-selling product. Eyeing the opportunity, Bayer acquired Monsanto for $63 billion. When Bayer purchased Monsanto in 2018, it also acquired a hoard of legal problems Monsanto was facing. Soon, thousands of lawsuits from citizens complained about health problems with correlations leading to glyphosate-based herbicide use. The cell death in cortical neuron lawsuits all made their way to Bayer.

2015 the World Health Organization (WHO) identified glyphosate as a carcinogen. It warned consumers about exposure’s potentially toxic effects and health risks, such as brain and spinal cord damage, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and other cancers. Before the 2015 WHO warning, many studies conducted in the past, including “A case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and exposure to pesticides” completed in 1999, suggested a link between glyphosate exposure and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A 2013 research suggests that glyphosate induces human breast cancer cell growth through estrogen receptors.

Findings of Previous Studies Show Glyphosate Cross the Blood Brain Barrier

Previous studies, such as the 2011 “Aseptic meningitis in association with glyphosate-surfactant herbicide poisoning” and many more, have shown that once in the environment and you become exposed, glyphosate crosses the blood-brain barrier. It leads to cell death in vitro models. However, it has not extensively studied glyphosate in human brain models or its pathological effects. Findings from previous research also suggest that exposure to herbicides for six weeks in adult rats leads to peripheral blood inflammation.

It also revealed that glyphosate exposure resulted in a detectable tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) in the examined sample rat’s liver. A 2010 research suggests that a healthy brain’s TNFα levels are low. However, those suffering from cancer, psoriasis, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative diseases have shown increased levels of TNFα molecule in their brains. There is a strong link between TNFα and the progression of Alzheimer’s disease.

A 2017 research study on chronic exposure to glyphosate in mice revealed changes in brain-related function but did not establish whether the substance infiltrated the brain, inducing cell death. But things are changing.

Recent Experiments Suggest Effects of Glyphosate on Brain Tissue

A 2022 study explored the connection between glyphosate and neurodegenerative disorders by experimenting on 48 four-month-old mice. The mice received various doses of glyphosate per day for 14 days to study the substance’s effects. On the final day, the researchers collected urine, plasma, and brain samples to analyze for anomalies. Let’s examine the experiment’s results and determine how glyphosate infiltrates your brain.

Glyphosate Detected in Brain Tissue

The experiment revealed that an increased dose of glyphosate led to increased glyphosate levels in the mice’s brains. There was also higher aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), glyphosate’s major metabolite.

The study also found a strong correlation between brain glyphosate and AMPA; as the brain glyphosate increased, so did the levels of AMPA. It also showed a significant correlation between brain glyphosate and urine glyphosate levels.

Glyphosate Increases Brain TNFα

The findings of the study also revealed an increase in the following:

  • Brain TNFα in specific brain areas affected by neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
  • Hippocampal TNFα levels
  • Cortical TNFα levels.

Collectively, the study suggested an increase in brain TNFα from glyphosate exposure.

Glyphosate Increases Peripheral Blood Plasma

The researchers analyzed blood plasma to determine the effect of glyphosate on the levels of TNFα in the periphery.

The findings of the experiment showed a significant dose-dependent increase in the levels of the following:

  • Brain TNFα
  • Brain homogenate
  • Hippocampal TNFα
  • Cortical TNFα.

It also showed effects on the hippocampus, cortical homogenates, and cortex. A significant relationship exists between glyphosate and TNFα in the brain, especially in specific regions.

Brain Glyphosate Levels Correlation with Brain TNFα Levels

Different linear correlation models revealed a positive correlation between the levels of the following:

  • Brain glyphosate and brain TNFα
  • Brain glyphosate and peripheral blood plasma
  • Urine and brain glyphosate
  • Urine glyphosate and peripheral blood plasma TNFα.

Exposure to Glyphosate Results in Transcriptomic Dysregulation

The study sets out to find the transcriptome change after glyphosate exposure. Analysis of cell-specific changes in gene expression revealed a positive enrichment of oligodendrocytes. It also saw the enrichment of oligodendrocytes in various biological processes, including central nervous system myelination.

Key Takeaway of the Recent Experiment and Neurodegenerative Diseases

  • Glyphosate showed a dose-dependent increase in brain tissue, supporting previous study results.
  • The possible degradation of glyphosate in vivo models suggests small amounts of AMPA. However, further research is required.
  • Exposure to glyphosate in mice suggested heightened levels of TNFα in blood plasma.
  • Elevated levels of TNFα in brain homogenates.
  • High levels of TNFα in specific brain regions affected by Alzheimer’s disease.
  • Brain glyphosate correlates with brain TNFα levels
  • There is a positive correlation between brain glyphosate and blood plasma and brain and urine glyphosate.
  • Glyphosate leads to higher cytotoxicity and reduced cell viability.
  • Glyphosate alters gene expression.
  • Glyphosate induces human breast cancer cell growth through its estrogen receptors.
  • The doses used on mice are above the daily human exposure but a benchmark set by the Environmental Protection Agency for experiments on rodents.

Dose-dependent glyphosate accumulation infiltrating brain tissue in the human body is natural. Brain tissue revealed glyphosate entered the brains of test subjects, including mice. Chronic pesticide exposure in testing shows significant health problems in glyphosate-treated groups compared with the general population. So, if you work around corn and soy crops, you will likely have a higher, more significant dose-dependent response.

Persistent exposure means farm workers in the Central Valley of California will have higher environmentally relevant concentrations and a greater chance of contracting brain disorders over their lives. Additionally, like Agent Orange, neurological disorders can lead to dysregulated gene expression, DNA damage/congenital disabilities/disfigurement. Other conditions can include neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and oligodendrocyte development.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law Glyphosate Exposure Injury Lawyers

Are you worried about differential expression analysis results after dosage regression? The recent study raises awareness of glyphosate exposure’s detrimental effects and potential hazards for those who are still using glyphosate products.

If you’re suffering from health conditions and are using glyphosate-based herbicides/pesticides, there is a likelihood that the herbicide has something to do with your deteriorating health. Contact us at (213) 596-9642 for a free consultation with our legal experts, as you may qualify for compensation after glial cell development from pesticide use.

Neurological Health Citations:

  • Arizona State University and the Arizona-based Translational Genomics Research Institute.
  • 2019 Pandey A , Dhabade P , Kumarasamy A. 2019. Inflammatory effects of subacute exposure of Roundup in rat liver and adipose tissue. Dose-Response. 17: 1559. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar].
  • J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4966. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19094966. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564359 Free PMC article. See all similar articles References Alavanja MCR, Hoppin JA, Kamel F. Health effects of chronic pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:155–197. DOI: 10.1146/annual.pub health.25.101802.123020. – DOI – PubMed Benbrook CM.
  • Ait Bali et al. 2017 Ait Bali Y, Ba-Mohamed S, Bennis M. 2017. Behavioral and immunohistochemical study of the effects of subchronic and chronic exposure to glyphosate in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 11: 146. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar].
  • Products Defects Lawyer
  • Contaminated Water Lawsuits
  • Bayer/Monsanto Roundup Cancer Lawsuit
  • Camp Lejeune Cancer Claims
  • Benzene Exposure in Los Angeles

Do All Steroids Cause Induced Osteoporosis and Bone Fractures?

Answer: No. Anabolics and Androgenics can actually fight bone loss, whereas Corticosteroids can cause bone weakening. Let’s explore with an injury lawyer, Michael Ehline, an expert in sports medicine law. When over-the-counter medications fail to provide relief to patients, doctors often prescribe a corticosteroid, which works as cortisol, a naturally producing hormone produced by the body’s adrenal glands. Many people don’t know that although corticosteroids are effective in treating many ailments, long-term use can lead to osteoporosis. However, anabolics, including Bio Pellets, can help males and females with libido problems (beware of an enlarged clitoris and developing a deeper voice for women). Androgens, the Anavar (Oxandrolone of Spa Milano Labs), is beneficial for bones.

Let’s explore the uses and risks of consuming corticosteroids with Ehline Law and our personal injury attorneys.

Types of Steroids

There are two main types of steroids; corticosteroids and anabolic-androgenic steroids (anabolic steroids). Anabolic steroids bind to the androgen receptors, assisting users in building muscle (anabolic) and increasing male characteristics (androgenic), whereas corticosteroids bind to the glucocorticoid receptors helping treat various medical conditions.

What Are Corticosteroids?

Corticosteroids, often shortened to steroids, are man-made synthetic drugs that help curb the production of certain chemicals in the body, alleviating inflammation, swelling, and irritation. Medical professionals may prescribe corticosteroids to treat asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, hives, or lupus.

Although corticosteroids can help several types of patients live a better life, it has long-term side effects such as osteoporosis (loss of bone density) and others.

How Can Patients Take Steroids?

There are two ways steroids help medical professionals treat various kinds of diseases, and these include the following:

  • Localized: Doctors prescribe localized steroids to target the outer body, including eye drops, ear drops, inhalers, skin creams, and ointments.
  • Systemic: Outer application of steroids may not be as effective for certain health conditions, which is why doctors may prescribe systemic steroids that flow throughout the body to where it is needed. Medical professionals may deliver systemic steroids through oral medications, muscle injections, or intravenous (IV) lines.

There are many different brands of corticosteroids, some of which include Prednisone, Cortisone, Triamcinolone, and Mometasone.

What Do Corticosteroids Treat?

From treating seasonal allergies to life-threatening inflammation, there are a lot of uses for corticosteroids.

Doctors may recommend steroid treatment for the following health conditions:

  • Hay fever
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Eczema
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Gout
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Autoimmune diseases.

When the immune system fails to work correctly, the body can start producing chemicals that cause internal harm. Medical professionals may recommend steroids to lower inflammation and prevent damage.

In patients who have undergone an organ transplant, there is always a risk of the body rejecting the organ. To reduce the risks associated with a transplant, medical professionals may prescribe steroids to the patient, which can help suppress the immune system.

Can the Use of Corticosteroids Lead to Corticosteroid-induced Osteoporosis?

The body uses calcium and Vitamin D to build bones, and the use of corticosteroid, in the long run, can reduce how the body absorbs calcium and increases the speed of bone breakdown. The rate at which corticosteroid reduces absorption ability and increases bone breakdown depends on the dosage and the period you take the steroid medication.

In higher doses, steroids can lead to rapid bone loss. However, not all people experience a similar rate of bone loss. Dosage, duration, and genetics play a vital role in the rate of bone loss following the use of steroids.

How Quickly Can Bone Loss Start after Consuming Steroids?

Bone loss (bone mineral density loss) following steroid consumption depends on the type of steroid taken (localized or systematic). For example, after consuming oral steroids, patients may experience bone loss after six months of continuous use. On the other hand, inhaled steroids do not have a similar rate of bone loss as compared to the consumption of oral steroids. However, in larger doses, it may also cause loss of bone mass.

Several studies show that patients using steroids in the short run do not exhibit any signs or symptoms of bone loss.

Does Steroid Use Increase the Risk of a Fracture?

Oral steroids equal to 5 mg of Prednisone consumed daily for more than three months increase the risk of bone fractures. As the dosage increases, so does the fracture risk. 

According to multiple studies, one in three postmenopausal women who routinely consume corticosteroids is likely to suffer a spinal fracture. Taking steroids increases the risk of spinal fractures twice as much as a person who does not consume such drugs.

After stopping steroid medication, the risk of bone fractures or vertebral fractures reduces significantly. However, it is crucial to speak to your healthcare professional before making personal decisions pertaining to medication.

Diagnosing and Treating Corticosteroid or Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis

When patients start steroid treatment for their medical conditions, conducting a Bone Densitometry, a special scan that measures bone density is crucial. After a year of steroid medication use, patients should conduct second Bone densitometry to help diagnose corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (also known as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis). Monitoring bone density when using steroid medication is the only way to diagnose steroid-induced osteoporosis.

Before medical professionals recommend taking a corticosteroid, they identify risk factors in patients that help them determine a treatment plan. People with lower bone mass or postmenopausal women who are not on estrogen are at a higher risk of bone loss when taking steroids.

In cases of loss of bone density due to the intake of steroids, doctors may recommend the same treatment plan to patients with osteoporosis. Hormone replacement therapy helps prevent osteoporosis in women, but it comes with side effects, such as an increased risk of blood clots, heart diseases, and many others.

Undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with medroxyprogesterone acetate, in the long run, can increase the risk of breast cancer. With other drugs or treatments, HRT combined treatments can lead to vaginal bleeding.

Medical professionals may consider alternatives to HRT treatment to help reduce the rate of bone loss and increase bone density over time, and some of these treatments include the following:

  • Bisphosphonates
  • Raloxifene
  • Calcitonin
  • Tamoxifen
  • Statins.

Are Anabolic-androgenic Steroids Different than Corticosteroids?

Unlike corticosteroids that help treat various medical conditions, anabolic steroids are synthetic versions of testosterone (male sex hormones that aid in building muscle).

Medical professionals prescribe anabolic steroids to help produce testosterone when a patient’s body does not make enough of them or in young boys who experience delayed puberty. Due to certain illnesses that cause muscle loss, such as AIDS and cancer, a doctor may prescribe anabolic steroids to build muscle mass.

In the sports world, anabolic steroid medications are also referred to as “performance-boosting” drugs. Athletes are often banned from taking such steroids as they can help with their athletic performance and muscle mass, giving them an unfair advantage over other athletes.

Do Anabolic Steroid Medications Cause Bone Loss in Patients?

Androgen inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption, and there are several anabolic steroids that are approved as anti-osteoporosis medication. In a 2008 study, “Effect of anabolic steroids on osteoporosis,” conducted by Masahiro Adachi and Ryoichi Takayanagi, the use of anabolic steroids in a group of patients showed a significant increase in bone mineral content in the radius and lumbar spine.

Another study, “Anabolic steroids improve bone mineral density,” conducted in 2014 by Reetadyuti Mukhopadhyay et al., revealed that a low dose of anabolic steroids can significantly help improve bone mass and quality of life in the elderly.

How to Prevent Bone Density Loss

Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain, recommends guidelines for preventing and treating corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Regardless of whether or not you have osteoporosis, it is crucial for everyone to take certain steps to prevent bone density loss and improve bone health, including:

  • Fulfill your daily calcium and Vitamin D requirement: Milk, Yogurt, cheese, broccoli, salmon, and orange juice are some examples of calcium-rich food. Those who cannot consume such food items or have limited access to them may consider taking calcium supplements.

The following are the daily requirements of calcium and Vitamin D for different groups of people:

  • Women on HRT treatment: 1,200 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D daily.
  • Women with an increased risk of steroid-induced osteoporosis: 1,500 mg of calcium and 800 IU of vitamin D daily
  • Men (under 65 years of age): 1,000 mg of calcium daily
  • Men (over 65 years of age): 1,500 mg of calcium daily
  • Exercise: Certain types of strength training help strengthen muscles and reduce bone loss. Weight-bearing exercises such as walking and jogging can help support the bones in the legs, hips, and lower spine.
  • Avoid smoking: Smoking reduces the body’s ability to absorb calcium, increasing bone loss.
  • Avoid alcohol: Drinking more than two glasses of alcohol daily cuts bone formation and reduces the body’s ability to absorb calcium. However, there is a need for further studies into the link between alcohol intake and osteoporosis.
  • Reduce caffeine intake.

Schedule a Free Consultation with Ehline Law

Not all steroids lead to osteoporosis or bone loss, as several studies suggest that medical professionals use anabolic to treat bone conditions. However, medical professionals must follow certain standards and guidelines before recommending steroid treatment to patients.

If you suffered injuries due to a negligent medical provider that did not consider your health or medical history before prescribing steroids, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be eligible for compensation.

Some Chia Powder Brands Recalled as Unsafe

Some Chia Powder Brands Recalled as UnsafeIn 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a warning to consumers against consuming Chia-seed powder due to the 21 cases of salmonella across 12 different states in the country from consuming the powder. Two people faced hospitalization from severe cases of salmonella in what could become a huge product liability case. Some of the states where salmonella cases saw a rise in 2014 were New York, Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, and more. At the same time, there were about 34 cases of salmonella contracted from the consumption of Chia-seed powder in Canada.

As a member of Ehline Law, we are responsible for educating the masses on legal issues and their rights. This article will explore the hype around Chia seeds, the story surrounding the 2014 Chia seed powder recall, some food poisoning lawsuits, and what to do if you’re experiencing a serious case of food poisoning.

Benefits of Chia Seeds

Chia seeds are edible seeds derived from a plant native to Mexico. Since the ancient Aztecs, people have used Chia seeds for medicinal purposes; however, they are now consumed as a nutrient-dense super-food.

Chia seeds contain powerful antioxidants that have many health benefits. The human body contains free radicals that cause oxidative stress and damage human cells. Consuming foods rich in antioxidants, such as Chia seeds, can help eliminate free radicals and reduce the risk of diseases arising from free radicals, including heart conditions, cognitive decline, and more.

Chia seeds have high fiber content (39% of your daily fiber needs) that helps improve blood sugar levels and minimize the risk of type 2 diabetes. It can even make you feel full, allowing you to eat less and maintain or reduce your weight.

Caffeine acid, present in Chia seeds, aids in reducing inflammation in the body. It also contains magnesium and potassium, which ensure strong bones. 18% of your daily calcium requirement in Chia seeds is enough to keep healthy muscles and nerves functioning. Chia seeds have more calcium than any dairy product when compared to the gram for gram.

Chia seeds also have a certain type of omega-three fatty acid that aids in reducing lower omega 6, which helps reduce chronic conditions like heart disease. When consuming Chia seeds, it is important to look out for digestive issues and how it interacts with your medications and allergies. Although Chia seeds are great for health, they are also prone to contamination, just like any food item. The most common disease from contaminated Chia seeds is salmonella.

What is Salmonella Infection?

In the United States, there are more than 1.35 million cases of salmonella annually, out of which 26,500 people face hospitalization and 420 people die from it. But what is this deadly disease?

Related to the family Enterobacteriaceae, the Salmonella bacterium is an intracellular pathogen that causes illnesses upon ingestion. The majority of salmonella infections are due to food contamination from animal or human feces, such as by food service workers at commercial eatery joints.

There are two main groups of salmonella, typhoidal and nontyphoidal. Nontyphoidal serotypes are salmonella that can be transferred from an animal to a human or from one human to the other. Invasion of nontyphoidal serotypes occurs through the gastric system, causing several symptoms that, fortunately, do not require antibiotics to treat. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, nontyphoidal serotypes are invasive and can cause paratyphoid fever, requiring immediate antibiotic treatment.

Typhoidal serotypes are those types of salmonella that can be transferred only from one human to the other and can lead to foodborne diseases like typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Typhoid fever starts after the salmonella bacterium enters the bloodstream and spreads to all other organs, slowly releasing endotoxins. Complications can become life-threatening, and starting intensive treatment, including antibiotics, is crucial.

Symptoms of Salmonella

Depending on the species of salmonella contracted, there may be different kinds of symptoms. These symptoms can start six hours to six days after contracting the bacterium. However, it can take several weeks for some individuals’ symptoms to show up.

Those who have contracted salmonella bacteria may face symptoms similar to food poisonings, such as diarrhea, fever, and even severe abdominal cramps. However, some strains of the bacterium can cause serious problems after infecting an individual’s urine, blood, bones, and even the nervous system.

Diagnosis of Salmonella

Doctors can help diagnose salmonella by taking an individual’s urine, blood, or fluid sample and running it through a laboratory test.

How to Treat Salmonella

In cases involving individuals with a strong immune system, the body can take up to seven days to treat the bacteria without the need for antibiotics. Doctors recommend ingesting lots of fluids to replenish the loss of body water for as long as the diarrhea lasts.

Although antibiotics are only recommended for certain strains of salmonella, doctors may recommend antibiotics to people with severe illnesses, individuals with weak immune systems, older adults (ages 50 and above), and children younger than 12 months old.

In the majority of salmonella cases, people recover completely. However, some people may not have normal bowel habits for a few months. Another long-term problem pertaining to salmonella infections is that after a person goes through salmonella, they may have reactive arthritis. This is usually difficult to treat and can last for months or even years.

There have been many salmonella outbreaks in the United States, resulting from the consumption of raw cashew cheese, ground beef, tahini, ground turkey, peanut butter, onions, mangoes, and other foods. Here, we will explore the 2014 salmonella outbreak caused by the consumption of Chia seed powder.

The 2014 Chia-Seed Powder Recall

Chia seed powder took the United States by storm when it received a super-food status, with many young individuals and health-conscious Americans mixing it in their smoothies, cereals, and more. However, just like sprouts that are prone to bacterial contamination, Chia seed powder also faces similar health risks. Food bugs can grow, live, and breed in different types of foods, including Chia seed powder.

In 2014, 21 Americans reported sickness after purchasing and consuming Chia seed powder. It wasn’t clear before how the sickness occurred, but after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigators started interviewing the sick residents, they all had one thing in common: consumption of Chia seed powder. Two people were facing severe symptoms of salmonella infection and had to be admitted to a hospital for medical care.

Are Chia Seeds Also Contaminated?

Investigators conducted tests on Chia seed powder and Chia seeds to find out if both were facing similar health risks, such as possible salmonella contamination. However, their tests only resulted in sprouted Chia seed powder as the main component for the growth of Salmonella bacteria.

Chia seed powder preparation includes sprouting the seeds and then crushing the sprouts into a fine powder form. However, the health risks start during the sprouting stage as the conditions required to sprout Chia seeds are also ideal for growing pathogens such as salmonella.

Some Chia Powder Brands Recalled as Unsafe

As the cases of salmonella infection rose in the United States and Canada at the same time, Chia seed powder brands decided to recall their organic sprouted Chia powder to avoid further incidents. It started with Navitas Naturals recalling their product, with other brands, including Health Matters America Organic Traditions, Green Smoothie Girl, Navitas Naturals, and Williams-Sonoma, following right after.

Organic Traditions from Health Matters America not only recalled their sprouted Chia seed powder but also sprouted Chia and flax seed powder. On June 26th, the company further recalled additional products that contained Chia seeds to prevent the outbreak.

One of the recalled brands, Green Smoothie Girl, recalled two of its products that they distributed to many stores and sold directly to consumers online. Oriya Organics recalled their Super-food Protein Medley as the mixture contained Chia seeds.

Although the brands have already recalled their products, Chia seed powder has a long shelf life, and some may be lying around in your kitchen cabinets. Double-check your pantry and if you still have some hiding in your kitchen, throw it away and save yourself and your family a trip to the doctor.

Other Salmonella Outbreaks in the United States

Jif Peanut Butter Recall

In May 2022, the FDA reported a salmonella outbreak in a few states, and investigations led to Jif peanut butter as the main source of it. Investigations have started at J.M. Smucker Company after five out of five infected reported consuming peanut butter, and four out of those five stated that they consumed different varieties of Jif peanut butter before they got ill, leading to a peanut butter recall.

In 2010, the FDA conducted whole-genome sequencing on an environmental sample taken from J.M. Smucker Company in Lexington. The results from that sample match the salmonella strain recently contracted by the individuals, and the epidemiologic evidence suggests that Jif brand peanut butter was the cause of it.

J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled lot codes 1274425–2140425 of their peanut butter to avoid further salmonella contamination in the country. The company publicly announced their recalled products and further stated that if any consumers have already purchased peanut butter and other products with the mentioned lot codes, they should throw them out. Individuals should clean and sanitize all the surfaces and utensils that came into contact with the peanut butter.

The FDA is currently investigating the cause of the peanut butter contamination.

More than 1,000 People Sick from Imported Onions

In October 2021, a wave of Salmonella Oranienburg infections started spreading across the United States, resulting in 1,040 illnesses across 37 states. Health officials stated that the true extent of salmonella contamination remains a mystery as the majority of people recover from the disease by resting at home and taking OTC medications for the symptoms.

The initial investigations led to a serious warning by the FDA to an import-based company for not complying with the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) requirements.

The company was importing fresh red onions from Chihuahua, Mexico, to the United States without conducting quality checks on imported goods from its suppliers. This warning suggested taking strict actions against such suppliers as soon as possible to prevent further issues or face serious action from the FDA.

Since then, the company has recalled its red and yellow onions. The CDC notified all United States residents to throw away all onions from New Mexico or not have a label stating where the onions originated from.

The 2021 outbreak was not the first case of salmonella contamination from onions. In 2020, there were more than 869 cases and 116 hospitalizations across 47 states. This initial recall included onions sold under different brands such as Thomson Premium, TLC Thomson International, Kroger, and more.

However, there were subsequent recalls of two different products, cheese dip and salsa, as some companies used salmonella-contaminated red onions in these products.

American Cucumbers from Mexico Infect More than 900

In 2015, a large salmonella outbreak in the United States affected 907 people and killed six across 40 states. Investigators found that 63% of the patients consumed cucumbers the week before their salmonella infection. 49% of the infected were younger than 18 years old.

After tracing the cucumbers back to their origin, the investigation revealed that Andrew & Williamson fresh produce imported cucumbers from Rancho Don Juanito in Mexico. The FDA conducted a pre-inspection where it reported the equipment design of the pre-wash area, the waste management system, and the storage of packing material as the reason for the infection.

Fortunately, the suppliers followed the pre-inspection findings and improved their food safety standards and systems. They even stopped October’s harvest of cucumbers to avoid outbreaks.

Can I File a Salmonella Lawsuit?

Yes, you can file a salmonella lawsuit as it falls under product liability claims, a claim where you unknowingly purchase a defective product that causes you harm. In a food poisoning case, the defective product is the contaminated food, and the damage or injuries sustained is food poisoning.

However, it is important to understand the difference between minor and major injuries. It is not worth pursuing a food poisoning case if the victim has minor and common food poisoning symptoms such as diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. This is because the damages suffered aren’t severe enough to warrant the cost of hiring an attorney.

Suppose the victim suffers from serious complications as a result of contaminated food and requires hospitalization. In that case, the damages are severe, and it is important that they pursue a food poisoning lawsuit against the negligent party.

There are three different legal theories in the case of defective products, and these include the following.

Strict Product Liability

This type of product liability relieves the sick person from proving that the manufacturer or distributor did not take adequate measures to ensure the product was fit for consumption. You must prove that the food product you consumed had traces of contamination that led to the cause of your illness.

Negligence

You can hold the manufacturer or distributor responsible for acting negligently, resulting in contaminated food that led to your sickness. However, to prove negligence, you must show that the defendants failed to exercise reasonable care when making or supplying the contaminated food items, resulting in your sickness.

For example, suppose a supplier recalled onions, and the supermarket was aware that those particular onions had traces of salmonella contamination but still sold them. In that case, you may have a negligence case.

Breach of Warranty

Some states have minimum standards for products, and selling contaminated products is a breach of those warranties. The contaminated product might even violate some of the express guarantees made by the company, for example, the “triple washed” label on a fruit pack.

Examples of Food Poisoning Lawsuits

$14,000 Mahi Mahi Lawsuit

In 2014, after having a Mahi Mahi for dinner at The Cheesecake Factory at Bayshore Town Center, Ghassan Batayneh felt a bit dizzy. Batayneh passed out and fell from his chair onto the floor, alarming the restaurant management to call for emergency services.

Paramedics arrived and took Batayneh to the emergency room at a nearby hospital for medical examination. Tests revealed that Batayneh had scombroid poisoning, which occurs when one eats fish that are not properly refrigerated and starting to rot. Scombroid poisoning is a type of foodborne illness where cooking food at high temperatures does not kill the deadly bacterium.

Batayneh filed a lawsuit against the company, which initially declined liability but later settled the lawsuit for $14,000. Since then, the company has removed Mahi Mahi from its menu to prevent any further cases of scombroid poisoning.

$30,000 Payout for Lunch Break

In Connecticut, a dozen office workers had lunch prepared by a local well-known restaurant. After a day, all the workers became violently ill, showing severe symptoms of food poisoning. Since all 12 office workers became ill, they started to believe that the local restaurant was not maintaining minimum standards and therefore sued the restaurant.

Lawyers held the caterer responsible for the illnesses that sickened 12 office workers, and the court ordered the restaurant to pay $370,000 in settlements. That’s more than $30,000 per worker!

$695,000 E. Coli Contamination Settlement

A Michigan man consumed food containing traces of E. coli, a bacterium of Escherichia commonly found in the lower intestines. After ingesting contaminated food, the victim became seriously ill and required hospitalization.

The victim had severe symptoms of E. coli, which resulted in renal failure and severe hypotension. The victim almost lost their life due to the infection and complications from contaminated food. After several days of hospitalization, the victim’s health stabilized, but the illness left him with long-term bodily issues.

Traumatized by the ordeal, the Michigan man sued and received $650,000 in compensation.

$1 Million Raw Oysters Settlement

In 1988, Kilpatrick was staying at a Holiday Inn when he decided to order room service. He placed an order for raw oysters, a delicacy in San Francisco. After consuming the raw Louisiana shellfish, Kilpatrick started displaying symptoms of food poisoning, such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. However, things started to look bad for him as an infection appeared on his leg, eating away at his skin, muscle tissue, and tendon.

Diagnosed with vibrio cholera infection, Kilpatrick was immediately admitted to a hospital where he developed bone marrow infections and fractures. During his recovery, Kilpatrick had lost the will to live. Depressed, he tried to end his life twice but failed. After spending $80,000 in hospital fees, doctors discharged Kilpatrick with a wooden cane to assist him with walking.

Kilpatrick decided to sue the responsible parties and, in the end, received a million-dollar out-of-court settlement from five companies. The lawsuit also shed light on the food laws in California, bringing important changes to reduce the risk of food poisoning in the state.

Is a Food Poisoning Lawsuit Challenging?

Unlike many personal injury cases, food poisoning lawsuits are difficult to win as there are two main arguments the defendants like to use, and these are:

  • Lack of causation
  • Lack of damages.

One of the most difficult aspects of a food poisoning case is proving that the defendant’s actions were the main reason for the plaintiff’s injuries. This is because food poisoning symptoms start to show up after hours, or even days, after digesting the contaminated food. This makes it challenging to prove that the defendant’s food caused the illness and not some other food consumed during that intermediate period.

The food poisoning victim can prove that the defendant’s food caused the illness by getting their stool tested for microbes. If the result matches with those found in the contaminated food, it can strengthen your food poisoning case and improve your chances of securing compensation.

Before deciding to pursue a lawsuit for your food poisoning, it is important to speak to an attorney to identify potential damage and the possibility of a lawsuit.

Damages You Can Recover for Your Food Poisoning

The two types of compensatory damages you can claim after food poisoning are:

  1. Economic damages
  2. Non-economic damages.

In rare cases, the court may also award punitive damages.

Economic Damages in a Food Poisoning Lawsuit

Economic damages are those types of damages that have a dollar value attached to them. These may include current medical bills, future medical expenses, prescription medication, hospitalization costs, lost wages, and more.

The economic damage depends on the circumstances the victim is in. For example, if a victim becomes permanently disabled, they might also be able to recover lost earning capacity damage from the defendant.

Non-Economic Damages in a Food Poisoning Lawsuit

These types of damages are more difficult to calculate since there is no dollar value attached to them. Non-economic damage may include pain and suffering, loss of life enjoyment, emotional distress, disfigurement, and more.

If a spouse or family member loses someone to food poisoning, they can also claim loss of companionship and other types of damages in their wrongful death claims.

Punitive Damages in a Food Poisoning Lawsuit

The court also awards punitive damages as a means to punish the defendant for carrying out reckless or negligent acts in the future that could potentially harm more citizens. Under California Civil Code 3294, the court can award punitive damages if the plaintiff proves that the defendant acted with malice or fraud.

Let’s look at an example of punitive damage. In 2021, Travis Knorr suffered from severe food poisoning after consuming contaminated sprouts in a Jimmy John’s sandwich. Knorr tested positive for E. coli and soon developed a C. difficile infection, requiring him to undergo a fecal transplant.

This incident was one of the 80 outbreaks of food poisoning from Jimmy John’s sandwiches, with the first one dating back to 1973. The judge granted Knorr’s request to seek punitive damages as the establishment failed to take contaminated sprouts off the menu, did not communicate the risks to their customers, and failed to provide their staff with adequate resources to prevent cross-contamination.

What to Do After Food Poisoning?

Whether you’re eating at a restaurant or buying groceries from a supermarket, you can fall victim to food poisoning. If you get sick after eating food, it is important to see a doctor. Although most foodborne illnesses result in minor symptoms, some can be really deadly, resulting in serious complications and even death.

Your doctor will conduct a few tests to determine the source of the illness. By identifying the type of bacteria present in stool, blood, or urine, doctors can help you trace the source of the disease and prevent others from getting it.

You must also report the illness to your local health department. There may be a possibility of contamination in other food items, and it is important to notify the relevant food authorities to investigate and1 prevent a potential outbreak.

If your case of food poisoning is severe and you require hospitalization, it is important to keep as much evidence as possible to strengthen your lawsuit.

Some of this evidence includes:

  • Food leftovers
  • Food purchase receipts
  • Noting down the details of the incident (time, place, and symptoms)
  • Details of witnesses
  • Any other relevant evidence.

Should I Sign a Waiver?

If you’ve gotten sick from eating at a restaurant and report it to them, the restaurant might offer you a refund or a free meal next time you visit them.

However, don’t let their politeness fool you, as they’re only offering you help to get you to sign a waiver that would prevent them from getting into legal trouble. They might even offer you a refund, a free meal, or even a gift card on the condition that you sign a waiver.

Before you sign away your legal rights, it is important to speak to an experienced food poisoning attorney about your rights and potential damage.

Can I Sue a Restaurant for Risk Warnings Against Consuming Raw Foods?

Restaurants serving raw or undercooked food must have risk warnings on their menu to notify their consumers of the potential risks of consuming such food items.

The California Retail Food Code requires a restaurant to advise consumers on consuming the following raw or undercooked:

  • Egg
  • Beef
  • Poultry
  • Shellfish
  • Sauce
  • Milk, and more.

Establishments can only serve raw foods on two conditions, and these are:

  1. If the consumer requests the food to be raw or undercooked.
  2. If the establishment notifies its guests, orally or verbally, that the food is raw or undercooked. These types of warnings are typically common at restaurants that serve sushi, hamburgers, desserts, and oysters.

That said, it is also crucial to understand that just because a restaurant menu mentions the fact that the food is raw or undercooked doesn’t mean that these restaurants are immune to lawsuits. If an injured victim can prove that there was employee negligence when preparing, handling, or serving food that resulted in food poisoning, they may have a claim.

Let’s look at an example. John goes to a continental restaurant and orders raw oysters, steak, Caesar salad, and a cocktail. The restaurant’s menu has a clear warning that raw foods can cause foodborne illnesses. After 24 hours of consuming the meal, John starts to develop symptoms of food poisoning.

A day passes, and the symptoms of food poisoning become severe, requiring John to seek immediate medical help. Due to hospitalization, John misses three days of work and racks up a hefty medical bill. Although the menu mentions the warning risk, the foodborne illness could be from cross-contamination or poor hygiene rather than the consumption of raw food.

John gets his medical report that states the bacteria spreading through his body is mostly present in fecal matter, suggesting that John suffered from food poisoning not because of consuming raw food but due to poor hygiene. In such situations, John can pursue legal action against the restaurant for its negligent actions.

If you have suffered a serious case of food poisoning and are looking for a trusted attorney for legal representation in California, contact us at +(833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation.