Skip to main content

Author: MichaelEhline

Redondo Beach Scene of Approximately One Million Dead Fish

March 8, 2011 – I was watching the news this morning, and I saw that on Tuesday, there were approximately one million dead fish in King Harbor, Redondo Beach. So I went to the gym and decided, “What the heck?” I will drive down the street and see for myself after my workout. I got there but ended up at the far south harbor, where the fewest fish died. On my Blackberry, I snapped these pictures of fishermen pulling out dead and live fish.
Barrel of Sardines Taken out of King Harbor Redondo Beach
A Barrel of Sardines Taken out of King Harbor Redondo Beach I had to go to court that day, as I am a Redondo Beach personal injury attorney, so I did not have time to take more pictures of where the larger fish schools had died. This incident is the largest that has occurred in California, and it is believed that they might have been victims of rough seas and oxygen deprivation. I believe it. So many sardines were swimming around that they could have consumed all of the oxygen in the harbor. According to State Fish and Game spokesman Andrew Hughan, there is no threat to the public or other marine life. The fish were not victims of a red tide and were believed to be victims of oxygen deprivation and, in fish terms, drowned. Hughan said the first reports of dead fish were primarily sardines, reported Monday night. Boaters Tuesday night got the full view of the number of dead fish. He also stated that this situation is going to have a terrible odor and will only get worse. There has been no has-mat safety issue, and, as I stated above, workers with nets and buckets were cleaning the dead fish out at King Harbor Marina. Hughan noted that the fish had washed up on shore and on rocks and covered the harbor with dead fish. Some scientists believe the fish were trying to escape the rough seas, heading for calmer water. They felt the fish swim around the sea wall into water that lacked oxygen. Hugan stated that underwater, the dead fish were piled between one and two feet deep, and he or city officials could not estimate how long it would take for the cleanup. He said there were no red tide or toxic substances in the water. Some biologists plan to conduct necropsies, which is an autopsy on the fish to ensure that they did die from oxygen deprivation. Anyways, this is trustworthy citizen journalism. Booyah CNN.
Wrongful Death Examples Wrongful Death Examples

A Short History of Wrongful Death Law

Claims of wrongful death are statutory creatures in one form or another. Understanding how it all works is another story. In California, a person/entity that caused the death of another human being is a typical wrongful death defendant. Family members of the decedent usually bring wrongful death claims in a civil action under the existing statute for their state.

Common-Law Rights Distinguished?

As per common law, a deceased person could not bring about a lawsuit, which resulted in a loophole. Because of this loophole, it was said that the “claim died with the decedent.” So, a living, brain-dead victim was worth a lot, and a dead person was worth nothing at all. But this caused a lot of bereaving survivors to engage in revenge killings.

After all, normally, activities that cause a person to suffer injury result in civil sanctions. But that was all changed in American courts at the turn of the century to try to end this pound-of-flesh dilemma.

The Preponderance of The Evidence or Reasonable Doubt Standard?

The prevailing standard of proof in most U.S. courts is usually preponderance of the evidence versus clear and convincing beyond a reasonable doubt. It is on the balance of probabilities in the United Kingdom and Australia. So this is why it’s frequently simpler for families to seek justice against a person responsible for the loss of the life of their family member through tort rather than a criminal prosecution.

Criminal Versus Civil

Neither criminal nor civil penalties aren’t equally exclusive. The state can criminally prosecute a person who has caused the loss of life for murder. So regardless of manslaughter, murder, criminal homicide, or a different theory, jail time and fines are the usual penalties. But victims who lived can sue their family member’s killer in most state civil courts for the action of wrongful death.

Also, when a business (not a person) has caused the loss of life to another person, the only available recourse is wrongful death. Most District Attorneys won’t file a murder case against a corporation. But families have brought lawsuits against tobacco companies and other killers. Michael Piuze represented some victims. This excellent lawyer has won billions for wrongful deaths caused by Big Tobacco’s customers.

Historical Rights of Wrongful Death Recovery

In most common law jurisdictions, there was no survivor’s right to recover civil damages for a negligent killing. Hence, the death claims died with the victim. So, actions for wrongful death became strictly statutory creations. Modernly, most jurisdictions authorize a civil recovery of wrongful death. Also, no current public policy exists against permitting compensation for wrongful death.

Modern wrongful death law has developed by applying common law principles to court decisions. Based on these principles, jurisdictions fill in loopholes to identify standard law recovery rules that could apply. So, basically, the statutes still rely on the old formulas under common law for situations of wrongful death.

As noted above, the state’s tort laws where the death occurred will determine issues such as legal liability. Noteworthy here, the foundation of wrongful death liability springs from an English Lord named “Campbell.” (see Fatal Accidents Act of 1846 or Lord Campbell’s Act.)

Are There Any Defenses To Wrongful Death Lawsuits?

Yes, the traditional defenses to any civil case apply. However, another compelling reason allows a court to decide whether the case can proceed. Waivers are heavily relied upon in cases of dangerous activities, like horse riding, boxing, etc.

Often, a carnival ride operator or sports club manager will seek signed liability waivers to insulate themselves from a wrongful death lawsuit. Sometimes, these waivers are enforceable as a defense, and other times, they are not enough to avoid liability. However, waivers provide varying degrees of protection against wrongful death lawsuits.

Continue reading

Elements Leading to Wrongful Death Drowning

Who Is Legally Responsible for Drowning Accidents?

Victims or their families sue the parties responsible for drowning lawsuits. Inattentive supervisors and property owners may be among them. Wrongful death and negligence are two typical examples of common legal claims.

Depending on the circumstances, plaintiffs regarded in drowning accidents may get compensated for medical bills, pain and suffering, and lost wages. If the victim dies, the deceased’s family may be able to collect funeral costs and lost financial support.

Who Do You Hold Liable in a Drowning Accident Wrongful Death Lawsuit?

The property owner or landlord may get held accountable for drowning accidents in private pools (for example, backyard pools.).

This is particularly true if the homeowner disobeyed the state’s safety regulations. For example, pool owners in Los Angeles must keep protective containers, safety latches, and alarm monitors in place.

Operators or owners of public pools could be held liable for a drowning accident. For example, employers may be held “vicariously liable” for the workers’ negligence under California’s “Respondeat Superior” statute. Employees, including lifeguards, might also face legal action. However, most employees do not have the financial resources that property owners do.

If a person goes overboard from a boat, the operator or owner of the ship may be held liable. They may have failed to give people life jackets or been driving the boat while intoxicated.

When children drown, the adults responsible for their care may be held liable. It doesn’t matter if the drowning accident happened on a beach, in a bathtub, pool, or lake.

Which Party Sues in a Wrongful Death Lawsuit if the Victim Dies in a Drowning Accident?

Numerous people die as a result of drowning incidents. Victims’ families can then file a wrongful death lawsuit against the individuals or groups who caused their deaths.

A wrongful death lawsuit may get filed by any of the following family members:

  • Surviving spouse
  • Living children
  • Domestic partner
  • Grandchildren – only if the dead person’s children have passed away
  • Any other family members or individuals entitled to the decedent’s property via intestate succession legislation.

Most drowning victims survive but go into a vegetative state. People holding the victim’s power of attorney can then sue on their behalf. This could be the deceased’s spouse, a close relative, or another legal representative named by the victim.

What Wrongful Death Claim Can You File Following a Drowning Incident?

Wrongful Death

The victim’s family members may file a wrongful death lawsuit following a drowning death.

The family would have to demonstrate the following:

  • The victim or decedent died; the defendant caused the death through malicious intent or negligence;
  • Families get financially harmed as a result of the end; and
  • A personal representative is appointed to the deceased’s estate.

A “survival” cause of action may be added to a wrongful death claim in Los Angeles, California. This lawsuit is filed on behalf of the victim’s property and seeks to reimburse the family of the deceased for their losses.

Negligence

To win a negligence case, the plaintiff must show that:

  • The defendant had a duty of care to the plaintiff
  • The defendant breached the duty of care via negligence
  • The accused person’s fault was a significant factor in causing death or harm

In a drowning accident lawsuit, examples of negligence include:

  • Lack of child supervision around a koi pond,
  • There aren’t any lifeguards on duty, and daycare workers leave kids alone in a pool area.

Premises Liability

Negligence is a type of premises liability. It occurs when property owners or managers are held accountable for incidents on their properties, even if they were not there at the time of the accident.

To establish premises liability, the plaintiff needs to show usually:

  • The defendant previously occupied, owned or managed the property.
  • The plaintiff got hurt because the defendant was irresponsible in the maintenance or use of the property.
  • The defendant’s negligence played a significant role in the plaintiff’s injuries.

Property owners could be held accountable for drowning accidents if they possessed an uncovered swimming pool.

What Compensatory Damages or Financial Compensation Can a Plaintiff Win?

Victims of drowning lawsuits who sue for carelessness may be able to receive compensatory damages.

This includes the following:

  • Medical expenses
  • Counseling, physical and occupational therapy, and other similar services
  • Lost income, lost wages, and earning ability lost
  • Pain and suffering
  • Loss of a husband or wife or registered domestic partner’s consortium
  • Scarring or permanent disabilities

Damages in wrongful death claims may include:

  • Expenses for the burial and funeral expenses
  • Compensation for the loss of support and companionship, as well as the financial income the decedent would have previously earned as income

The court can also award punitive damages in severe instances. However, the plaintiff must generally establish that the offender engaged in extreme or outrageous behavior.

What Happens If There Is a Liability Waiver?

A liability waiver signed by a minor (under 18) may not become enforceable. Signing is usually required by one of their parents or a legal guardian.

Even if the waiver was lawful, there is still a potential that the accident isn’t covered. It all relies on the waiver’s language and the circumstances surrounding the drowning.

Additionally, drowning accident attorneys can assist the victim in determining whether or not the waiver is valid and how to challenge it.

Do Insurance Companies or Homeowners Cover Drowning Deaths and Drowning Injuries?

It is contingent on the policy’s conditions and limitations. Insurance companies are often notorious for refusing to honor policies. On the other hand, victims’ friendly and charismatic accident lawyers can always sue them or implement legal claims against them.

How Does a Defendant Fight Against Wrongful Death Lawsuits Regarding Drowning Deaths?

Many drowning accidents usually result in unintentional death, and no one is to blame.

Among the possible defenses are the following:

  • Risk assumption
  • There is no duty of care
  • The victim was somewhat to blame
  • The victim previously relinquished liability

Risk Assumption

Assumption of risk shifts blame for injuries to the deceased person. Defendants in a drowning personal injury case may argue that the dead “assumed the risk” of drowning.

This is because entering or going near water or a swimming pool carries the risk of drowning.

No Duty of Care

Individuals who enter an owner’s property owe them a duty of care. On the other hand, the person’s duty of care is contingent on who they are.

This includes the following:

  • Those who get invited (such as handymen)
  • People who hold a license (such as friends)
  • Individuals who have a right (such as friends) (such as burglars)

Regarding intruders, a property owner’s only responsibility is to avoid a harmful situation. Trespassers may not recover damages if wounded on someone else’s land.

Trespassing-related injuries, on the other hand, may still be recovered. This usually occurs when the property has a harmful nuisance, such as an ungated swimming pool.

The Victim was Partially Responsible

It’s possible that more than one party is to blame for the drowning. Quite often, the sufferer bears some of the blame. However, property owners can still be held legally liable.

Juries may allocate damages and blame to multiple at-fault parties under LA’s “comparative fault” legislation.

The Victim Waived Liability

Waivers of liability may also be required to:

  • Surf
  • Swim
  • Boat
  • Scuba dive
  • Raft
  • Jetski.

These waivers usually are contracts someone can enforce. However, many of these disclaimers only shield the operator or owner from lawsuits based on “ordinary negligence.”

They might not be able to protect you from litigation based on gross negligence, unlawful activity, recklessness, or intentional harm.

Are Wrongful Death Cases Involving a Drowning Incident Common?

Each day, over ten individuals drown in the United States—children under 14 account for one out of every five drowning deaths in swimming pools. Males, minorities, and children under the age of four have the highest number of drowning victims.

Any amount of water may cause drowning. It may happen in lakes, reservoirs, ponds, or hot tubs, among other places. Only two inches of water is enough to suffocate young children.

Not everyone who drowns dies. Many people get left with lasting infirmities as a result of their survival. The following symptoms can result from a lack of oxygen in one’s brain:

  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Permanent vegetative states
  • Seizures
  • Loss of basic functioning
  • Learning disabilities
  • Paralysis.

Schedule a Free Consultation with our Experienced Lawyers from Ehline Law Firm for Legal Advice

Ehline Law Firm can help you! Each year, many drowning accidents occur in Los Angeles, California, whether in a swimming pool or beach.

Our swimming pool personal injury lawyers in Los Angeles, California, provide free consultations. Please get in touch with us at (213) 596-9642 or use the online contact form on our website if you know a family member or loved one who was recently a drowning victim.

Ehline Law Firm’s lawyers value the attorney-client relationship provided; therefore, our legal team acts in your best interests when fighting for justice for your loved one’s death. We fight for your legal rights, whether it involves drowning cases, car accidents, or other personal injury cases.

Wrongful Death Examples Wrongful Death Examples

Comparative Fault And California Wrongful Death Claims

An individual wounded in an accident may still receive damages under California’s comparative fault legislation, commonly known as comparative negligence, even if they are partially to blame for the accident leading to the surviving victim’s wrongful death action.

If a party is only 25% responsible for creating the auto accident, for example, they are only responsible for compensating 25% of the survivor’s damages. But it’s not just motor vehicle accidents that kill people. Imagine slipping and falling on watery oil at a gas station pump entrance or parking lot.

What if you had just seen another person slip in the same puddle and decided to walk through the slick anyway? What if there is videotaped evidence? Now, a jury must determine if you were reasonable enough to walk into a dangerous zone. So if you broke your hip or ankle, who pays and for what?

California’s Pure Comparative Fault Rule

California is, without a doubt, a pure comparative fault state. This means that even if a victim/plaintiff is 99% at fault for an incident, they may still be able to collect some damages under this particular fault rule in this service station scenario above. Hence, a plaintiff’s negligence can offset a portion of the other party’s liability.

This contrasts a modified comparative fault concept, which prevents plaintiffs from obtaining damages if they are 50% or more at fault in several other states.

To recap, auto accidents are not the only way someone can be killed, and a car accident lawyer isn’t always the best choice for a legal representative for more complex cases involving an accidental death.

Determining if the accident victim played a role in causing or contributing to their damages will always be the goal of the defense attorney and the insurance company in virtually every negligence case. Are you or your loved one being partially blamed for a death in an auto accident case like a big rig truck accident, dog bite, or premises liability, slip, trip, and fall incident?

You may be able to recover lost wages, medical expenses, and non-economic and punitive damages under California’s negligence rule. You can recover damages even if you’re partially at fault. But you must prove negligence to win your accident case.

The jury in a lawsuit determines how much of the plaintiff’s carelessness led to the injuries. Furthermore, the damages award can be lowered by the plaintiff’s percentage of responsibility if the plaintiff was partly responsible for their harm.

The pure comparative fault rule may apply in many California personal injury situations.

The following are the most prevalent types of pure comparative negligence claims:

  • Car accidents
  • Premises liability
  • Bicycle accidents
  • Medical malpractice
  • Product liability
  • Slip and fall accidents.

Call the Ehline Law Firm at (213) 596-9642 for further assistance. Michael Ehline is the best expert due to his military service, awards, accolades, and legal background.

Overview of Comparative Fault, Contributory Negligence, and Joint and Several Liability

What Is Comparative Fault?

The plaintiff in a personal injury case seeks monetary damages from the defendant. If the defendant is entirely to blame for the accident, the plaintiff has an entitlement to get 100% of their damages. What if, on the other hand, the plaintiff was somewhat to blame for the accident?

In addition, California’s comparative negligence policies are a legal philosophy that divides fault among all parties. The plaintiff’s damages are lowered because of their own fault, which led to the incident.

The defendant claims that the plaintiff’s fault contributed to or caused their harm in personal injury or wrongful death cases. After the defendant makes that argument, a jury evaluates how much of the fault is due to the injured party’s negligence. One jury reduces the plaintiff’s overall damages award by that percentage.

What Is Contributory Negligence?

This is a legal doctrine that prevents a negligent plaintiff from recovering damages. Even if a plaintiff is one percent to blame in an accident, they are not entitled to compensation. The regulation is well-known for negatively impacting plaintiffs’ recovery.

Furthermore, the Last Clear Chance Rule is an exception to this rule, allowing negligent plaintiffs to receive compensation if they can establish that the defendant had the last clear chance of avoiding an injury. Contributory negligence laws are regulations that only a few states in the United States follow.

Joint and Several Liability

A joint and several liability concept allows a plaintiff to receive the total amount of damages awarded from any responsible defendant.

After that, the defendants must sue each other for contributions. In the circumstances involving the collection of non-economic damages, California has amended its application of joint and several liability.

When it comes to these cases involving medical bills, lost wages, emotional distress, funeral costs, financial compensation, property losses, economic damages, repair costs, and other damages with a particular calculation, California still enforces joint and several liability.

How California’s Comparative Negligence Law Works

California currently has two types of comparative negligence laws: pure comparative negligence laws and modified comparative negligence laws. Under California’s pure comparative negligence system, the plaintiff is compensated for damages depending on each person’s percentage of fault.

In modified comparative negligence systems, plaintiffs recover compensation only if their personal responsibility does not exceed a specified proportion. In pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence states, a jury or judge determines the percentage of fault attributed to each party involved in the wrongful death case.

The ultimate monetary compensation given to plaintiffs in California will be determined using a pure comparative negligence system. In 1975, the ruling in Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal. 3d 804, adopted pure comparative negligence.

In that incident, a plaintiff had taken a left turn across three traffic lanes. Simultaneously, the defendant’s fast automobile collided with the plaintiff’s vehicle.

The California Supreme Court had to decide whether to continue following the common law rule of contributory negligence in tort personal injury lawsuits or embrace comparative negligence. Therefore, California is a pure comparative negligence state.

Contact Ehline Law Firm Today!

Are you asking, “Can my wrongful death case settle out of court?” Please do not hesitate to call Ehline Law Firm if you have any concerns about how you can recover damages, even if you were partially at fault in a car accident.

Are you interested in forming an attorney-client relationship? You may be entitled to a lump-sum payment. No matter what, if you would want to discuss your wrongful death case confidentially with one of our experienced attorneys.

Wrongful death cases are settled every day. Our friendly and charismatic lawyers form attorney-client relationships nationwide when they provide legal advice. Contact our friendly lawyers at (213) 596-9642 for a free consultation and case evaluation to discuss your legal options. You can also fill out our contact form 24/7 for a swift response from a talented, dedicated lawyer with vast legal experience, winning clients millions of dollars.

Common Dog Injuries After a Dog Attack | ehlinelaw.com

What Are Some Typical Injuries Following a Dog Attack?

Common Dog Injuries After a Dog Attack No two dog attacks are the same. Unfortunately, depending on the circumstances of the attack, the results could vary from a slight scratch to life-threatening. By understanding more about the types of injuries common after dog attacks, we can better treat them. Below is a list of some of the most common mental and physical damages caused by dog attacks.

Injury Types and Effects

  • Infection is shared among all types of dog attacks, including bites and scratches. It occurs due to incidents with large and small dogs alike. Infections can cause severe issues at the site and potentially serious illnesses such as rabies.
  • Abrasions are among the most minor, damaging injuries caused by animal attacks. Grazes and removing the top layers of skin can cause scarring but are usually treatable.
  • Lacerations include cuts and tears in skin and tissue. They can be severe and lead to infection and scarring.
  • Incisions. The dog’s claws or teeth commonly cause these and lead to lacerations or puncture wounds.
  • Puncture wounds. These are most likely to cause infection and can dig into a person’s muscle or bone.
  • Avulsion. This type of injury can involve skin or muscle torn away from the rest of the body. Sometimes, fingers or toes may be ripped or bit off.
  • Crush Injuries. This is caused by the powerful bite force of the dog, which can include severe bleeding, soft tissue damage, lacerations, or even bone fractures.
  • Fractures. Bones are not uncommonly broken or fragmented due to the effects of a dog’s attack. Larger dogs can push a person to the ground, breaking wrists, knees, elbows, and skulls. The injuries can include complete fractures, linear fractures running along the bone, or an open fracture when a bone is exposed to open air.
  • PTSD. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD, is a severe mental illness that a dog attack can bring on. Gruesome injuries and memories of the canine’s vicious, unrelenting attack can harm a person for life.

Life Following a Severe Dog Bite Injury

Recovery may be extended, painful, and difficult after a dog bite injury. All of the injuries listed above may cause severe scarring and disfigurement. Reach out to the trusted advisors at the Ehline Law Firm APLC for more information about paying for mental and physical therapy or any other type of support.