Skip to main content

Author: MichaelEhline

How Do I Rebuild My Home After the California Wildfire?

Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorneys

California has seen many fires. Lately, the Silverado fire, the Dixie fire, and more have left thousands of victims stranded without their homes and many injured victims suffering smoke, chemical inhalation, and disfiguring burn injuries.

But what’s even more devastating is for those victims to come back, assess the damages, and rebuild their properties.

Ehline Law Can Help You with Your Case Following a Wildfire

Our California wildfire lawyers at Ehline Law have developed a guide for you to know what to do when rebuilding your home.

Cost of Rebuilding a Home

The cost of rebuilding a home depends on many different factors, such as:

  1. Type of equipment used to extinguish the fire
  2. The severity of the damage
  3. Extent of heat
  4. Debris removal
  5. And more.

Let’s take the first point and understand how it affects the cost of rebuilding a home; for example, when there is a large fire, using sprinklers to extinguish the fire compared to hose pipes can cause less damage to the structure, ensuring the majority of it remains standing. This reduces the cost of rebuilding a home.

Get an Insurance Claim After the Fire

After the fire, get in touch with a qualified attorney to check and review your insurance policies. Your coverages will decide how much compensation you can claim from your insurance company if you are eligible for compensation.

The first step towards an insurance claim is filing the forms correctly, and our California wildfire attorneys can help collect evidence, determine your claims, and file for claims. After the claims get filed, insurers will send insurance adjusters to your property to assess the damage. Our attorneys will help negotiate with the insurance company and get you the compensation you need to rebuild your home.

Your insurance claim can include the following damages:

  1. Lost wages
  2. Additional living expenses
  3. Property damage
  4. Lost pets
  5. And more.

Debris Removal Program to Get Started

The first thing to do when rebuilding a home is to remove the debris, so contact the California State Department of Toxic Substances Control to help you remove any household waste and debris on the property ensuring a hazard-free environment to work with. To get a government body to remove debris from your property free of cost, property owners must fill out the right-of-entry form and submit that to start the debris removal process. Do note that this process may take some time since many local government bodies need to coordinate with the State’s Debris Task Force.

If you’re looking to expedite this process, you can hire a private licensed contractor to remove the debris, but this will cost you considerable money.

Get in Touch with a Town-licensed Septic Evaluator

Once you have removed all the debris, you need to contact a town-licensed septic evaluator to check for any damage to wastewater treatment systems or the septic tank. If your septic tank is okay, you can start to continue using it without the need for replacement or repairs, but if the evaluator finds issues with the system, you would need to replace or repair it. For that, you need to acquire a repair permit.

Start Living in Temporary Housing

Rebuilding your home will take a lot of time, and having a temporary housing arrangement can alleviate a significant burden on your shoulders if you get displaced by a wildfire. State governments partner with companies or organizations to provide temporary housing to displaced residents.

Register with Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, and get verified to have a trailer home or temporary housing arrangement for you at identified locations.

Things to Remember Before Rebuilding Your Home

Here are a few things you should keep in mind before rebuilding your home:

  1. Hire professionals to remodel your home
  2. Research permit history
  3. Find out if there are any incentives provided. Pacific Gas, after the fire, provided financial incentives to residents affected by the wildfire.
  4. Have your home plans approved by all relevant departments
  5. Submit plans to obtain permits.

Get Permit History from City Hall

You can find all permit history at city hall to help you understand if your home can get replaced, and you can also get the original building plans for your home if you wish to build the home according to the same design before the fire damage.

Start Building Your Home

Make sure you have a proper home building plan and get the right kind of permits, as it ensures that your property meets the minimum safety requirements to protect residents in any natural disasters.

Once you submit your plans to build a home and complete the process of obtaining permits, research a reliable contractor to start construction on your home, you can contact the California Department of State License Board for a list of approved contractors or check their website and remember to avoid storm chaser contractors that are not from your region.

Throughout the rebuilding process, your property will be inspected to ensure that the contractors follow the house plans submitted to the local authorities.

Future Fire Prevention – Safety Tips to Follow

In California, it is a law to have a smoke/fire detector in your home, so always check the detectors periodically to ensure they are working.

Besides that, follow the steps below to ensure safety during future fire outbreaks:

  • Place a fire extinguisher inside and outside the home and learn how to use it to protect your family
  • Remove all combustible vegetation around the home and within 30 feet of your home
  • Create an evacuation plan and inform your family about the fire drill during a fire breakout.

Contact Ehline Law to Deal with Your Insurance Company

If your home got affected by a wildfire and now you want to rebuild it, contact us at (213) 596-9642. Our California wildfire attorneys can help insurance companies find together the compensation you need to rebuild your home.

Contact us today and get a free case evaluation with legal experts today!

Citations:

https://wildfirerecovery.caloes.ca.gov/general-info/rebuilding/

https://www.readyforwildfire.org/post-wildfire/returning-home/

https://www.readyforwildfire.org/post-wildfire/rebuilding/

https://designeverest.com/blog/guide-to-rebuilding-building-after-fire/

What Are the Los Angeles Crime Rate and Crime Statistics for 2022?

According to Fox News, LDS, and Christian people we have interviewed, people with kids, start-ups, company owners, and others who disagree with what conservatives call the new faith-based religion of “wokeism” are fleeing California. Those on the left leave mainly due to high taxes and a lack of high-paying jobs and continue voting the same way expecting different outcomes, say frustrated former Californians living in Texas, Colorado, and Nevada.

What Are the Los Angeles Crime Rate and Crime Statistics for 2022?
What Are the Los Angeles Crime Rate and Crime Statistics for 2022?

Woke = Crime?

Ultimate Guide to Fleeing California’s Progressive Policies
Let’s try and find out if it’s theft, crime, drag queen library day in public schools, or something else. Below, I will cover the number of concerns and theft and property crime statistics for concerned citizens considering fleeing the Golden State.

What Is Theft?

Theft crimes are a category of crimes that target the property of another. The deliberate act of taking another person’s property or money without their permission and permanently denying the owner of the item is specifically referred to as theft.

Furthermore, the severity of the fines and repercussions for each larceny-theft Crime is closely correlated with the value of the theft, your criminal history, and the circumstances of the incident.

Robberies cover various charges, including infractions, aggravated assaults, misdemeanors, felonies, and gun violence.

What Are Property Crimes?

Property crimes also include those that don’t require theft. For example, the prosecutor should not show that the defendant committed theft to charge them with PC 496 – Receiving Stolen Property and PC 594 – Vandalism, both of which are property crimes.

Item crimes, like larceny offenses, can range in intensity depending on the defendant’s prior criminal history, the worth of the property or the cost of repair, and the specifics of the case.

According to available data, the property crime rate in Los Angeles is 1.2 times higher than the national average.

What Are the Statistics?

What Does the Los Angeles Police Department Have to Say?

According to the police officers’ data and Chief Michel Moore, the number of violent crimes in neighborhoods registered in Los Angeles in 2022 had stayed around the same as it did at this point in 2020 before the epidemic had fully taken grip of the country. Of course, we know the new woke DA doesn’t charge many violent crimes (he claims it’s “racist” to do so), so that is probably a lie. Crime and violence still rise when it’s not reported by corrupt L.A. politicians and their tax-paid agency employees. right?

Crime Rates

Compared to the 2,633 violent crimes reported at this point in 2020, Los Angeles has so far, in 2022, reported 2,752 violent crimes, an increase of just over 4%.

The number of REPORTED violent crimes in Los Angeles in 2021 was 30,078; the City’s crime rate was 804.28 per 100,000 people.

Property Crime Rate

Even when the woke DA hides the numbers, the property crime rate in Los Angeles is twice as high as the national average and comparable to that of cities like Dallas, San Francisco, Phoenix, and Atlanta.

Murder Rates and Homicides

Los Angeles, California, is comparable to other democrat-run cities like Portland, San Diego, and Las Vegas and has the 9th highest murder rate in the country at 10.6. If you use a gun to defend your family, expect to be jailed unless you are a gang member. It’s all about race now.

According to the most recent police statistics, 55% more shooting victims (gang members being released by DA Gascon are targeting wealthy areas) this year than in the first half of 2020. According to Lofstrom, when we consider aggravated assaults and non-self-defense gun violence homicides, there has been a worrying and noticeable increase in MURDERS. Currently, homicide is sitting at a rate of 181 murders. As in past years, firearms have been used in more than 75 percent of homicides and burglaries so far this year.

Is New York’s Violent Crime Rate Higher than Los Angeles, CA?

Formerly known for having a high crime rate, New York City (NYC) no longer has one. As a result of a dramatic decline in violent crime since the 1990s, New York City is today regarded as one of the safest major cities for robbery in the United States.

Los Angeles has a higher violent crime rate than New York City. It scored 29.1 for violent crimes in 2021, while NYC received a score of 28.2 for crime rates like murder, homicides, larceny-theft, burglary, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Regarding property crimes like theft, burglary, and arson, California scored 35.1, while NYC scored 24.9.

Is New York or Los Angeles Safer?

New York City is a safer place to live, even though the Los Angeles administration is working tirelessly to lower the City’s crime rate given the current trends. With their DA, who behaves more like a public defender, that isn’t very certain to occur, according to older Californians fleeing the state in droves.

What Is Causing the Rise in Violent Crime Rates?

According to figures from the Los Angeles Police Department, there were 172 killings in the City as of June 18, a rise of 35% from the first half of 2020 and a 5.5% increase from the same period last year.

Why has there been a crime surge in California? According to experts, there are several things driving it, but they don’t all agree on what they are.

It’s challenging to pinpoint a single contributing reason, including the pandemic, prison reform, societal upheaval following the death of George Floyd, and a general sense of hopelessness.

However, the property crime data is unmistakable, and the country’s urban residents in both small and large cities are concerned about the increasing trend.

What About Motor Vehicle Theft?

In the City of Los Angeles, CA, almost 30,000 vehicles are stolen annually. Essentially, motor vehicle theft accounts for about 24 percent of property crimes and 18 percent of all violent crime trends in the City. Auto theft is a significant and lucrative industry that is highly common in metropolitan cities. A car is stolen every 23 seconds, according to FBI crime figures.

A skilled auto thief can steal the average car in about a minute. 50% of the stolen vehicles in the City of Los Angeles that were recovered in 2003 had been stripped or had minor damage. Most stolen cars seem to be used for transportation. However, some are also prized for their parts.

What Types of Cars Are Usually Stolen?

Over the past ten years, the most commonly stolen automobiles have also been the most widely sold. The Toyota Camry, Honda Civic, and Honda Accord models from the late 1980s and early 1990s have been the most commonly stolen cars during the last five years.

They have become targets because of how easy it is to steal these cars. Owners of these vehicles should take security protocols to protect them against theft.

How Are Los Angeles’ Crime Rates Calculated?

You can calculate crime rates by multiplying the total number of recorded crimes in a given population. For example, in 2021, there were 397 murders in Los Angeles, with a population of 3.743.970. Then, 10.62 murders per 1000 people were committed.

Call Us Now for Your Free Consultation on Property Crime

Our Los Angeles, CA, violent crime attorneys at Ehline Law Firm offers easy access to individualized attention, effective representation, and knowledgeable guidance at a reasonable price.

Every property crime case we accept receives our complete attention, and we take great satisfaction in offering Los Angeles, California residents the best experienced legal representation.

Can London Police Extradite Americans for Anti Jihadi Posts About UK?

No. Unless the U.S. abolishes or alters the First Amendment, creating “dual criminality.” The question of whether London’s Metropolitan Police officers and prosecutors can extradite Americans for expressing their views online about jihadis and supporters of Sharia law in the U.K. brings up several important legal and ethical considerations. 

When considering whether the London police can extradite Americans for allegations of criminal online activities, you’re entering a maze of international law as an attorney. Extradition is a formal process where one country hands over a person to another country for legal proceedings. This process involves multiple steps and stringent requirements, making it complex. 

Many in the U.K., especially South London, are fearful of insulting Muslims the government invited to live among the native Brits. The government is afraid of another terrorist attack and has little respect left for the locals in the heavily Islamic areas. So, the U.K. has clamped down on the natives, prompting riots and complaints about a two-tiered justice system. Locals say young Muslims have organized into rape gangs, and homeland security is afraid to be called “racist” for clamping down. Some locals say police are supporting a “Taliban government” out of fear of a suicide bombing. And when we complain from across the pond, the U.K. Chief of Police wants you arrested and sent to a U.K. jail. Oppression against the natives seems to be what the police director and his thought police want.

The Threat By Thought Police Chief Rowley

The police act against individuals spreading false claims or engaging in inflammatory speech. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley warns that the law’s reach extends beyond city limits and national borders. 

Rowley emphatically stated, “We will throw the full force of the law at people. And whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”

Rowley addressed the issue directly when questioned about criticisms from figures such as Elon Musk regarding the government’s stance. Musk had reacted to a video allegedly depicting an arrest for offensive online comments with the question, “Is this Britain or the Soviet Union?”

In response, some pundits and politicians in the U.K. called for an investigation or even Musk’s arrest for publicly commenting on the controversy. A reporter pointed out that high-profile figures might be “whipping up hatred” and mentioned that “the likes of Elon Musk” are involved in stirring up online speech. She then questioned what measures the London police are prepared to take “when it comes to addressing individuals who incite this kind of behavior from behind a keyboard in another country.”

Extradition, Babar Ahmad, Natives, and Metropolitan Police Officers

Yes, the U.K. and U.S. have extradition treaties. London has been a hotbed for militant Islamic terrorism for years. The memory of Babar Ahmad’s alleged terrorist offenses and beatings by U.K. cops in 1990s London is still fresh in the memories of many immigrants; the U.K. seems to conflict with itself. In 2012, Ahmad lost his extradition battle and was sent to America to face trial in the U.S. After all, the U.K. fought Al Queda and the then Taliban government, only to see suicide bombings by “refugees” invited first by the Tories and then embraced by Labour as guaranteed welfare recipient voters. 

Birmingham natives have griped about Muslim Sharia law no, go zones, and rape gangs, as well as censorship and jail for complaining about the “boat people” for decades. (Mind you, Ahmad pleaded guilty in an American court to providing support for terrorism, including Al Qaeda. The FBI investigations show he ran a terror support network in south London, prompting terrorism charges.) So yes, there are ways an American could be deported by a U.K. police officer, just like Mr. Ahmad was sent to the U.S. 

Mind you, in that case, the sentencing judge, Janet Hall, “said there was no evidence he supported al-Qaeda or that he had knowledge of the 11 September plot.” Ahmad retains the record for being the longest-serving prisoner without trial in the U.K. We will get into the keyboard warrior threat by U.K. cops against the locals further down.

A Homegrown Terrorist Attack Against Native Brits = RIOTS?

It all finally kicked off when, remarkably, a Rwandan who probably wasn’t even a Muslim became the straw that broke the camel’s back. It’s been a tumultuous week in the U.K. Riots have escalated into looting, arson, violence, and threats by Muslims and natives. However, in their response to this crisis, U.K. officials seem to be drawing the wrong conclusions about how to address the turmoil. 

The unrest traces back to July 29, when three children were tragically murdered in a knife attack at a Taylor Swift-themed party in Southport, England. Ten others were injured. On that same day, a 55-year-old woman from Chester posted on social media, claiming the suspect “was an asylum seeker who came to the U.K. by boat last year and was on an MI6 watch list.”

“If this is true,” she wrote, “then all hell is about to break loose.”

But it wasn’t true. The 17-year-old suspect was “born in Wales to Rwandan parents” and is not an asylum seeker. Nonetheless, false information spread across social media, which the poster clearly stated she did not know was accurate. Police say the Chester woman was “publishing written material to stir up racial hatred” and “false communication.”

Riots erupted across England and Northern Ireland with looting, vandalism, and barricading buildings housing Mulsim immigrants. Police say both sides hurled threats, engaging in acts of violence. Police arrested hundreds. 

U.K. Police Threaten Native-Born British Islanders?

Police are accused of being scared of the Muslims who threaten violence, commit acts of violence, or engage in vandalism and arson. Hence, the locals argue that there is a two-tiered justice system. London police can’t resist the urge to see censorship as a solution to problems it can no longer solve with so many jihadis and proponents of Sharia law in the country now. Unfortunately, the U.K. government issued a warning on X to “Think before you post” while quoting a post from the Crown Prosecution Service about inciting hatred and “online violence.”

This does little to inspire confidence that officials will protect free speech while cracking down on illegal conduct. While urging people to think before speaking might seem like harmless advice, the vagueness of the government’s warning and the ominous threat of prosecution may stifle citizens’ legal expression about current events. 

Destruction of Speech Rights in the U.K.

The U.K. and its surrogate, Canada, have a terrible record of free speech. It was on a downward trajectory even before these riots. The tension between national sovereignty and international cooperation in cybercrime, freedom of speech, and wokeness are all at play. In the U.K., insulting someone or disagreeing with your government can be a crime, not just a civil defamation claim. This area of law is foreign to most U.S. personal injury attorneys like myself.

Treaties Play a Role in Extradition

Extrajudicial actions such as extraditions for online postings are not straightforward and involve a complex web of laws and treaties. The principle of dual criminality requires that the act be considered a crime in both the requesting and requested countries. Therefore, understanding the intricate legal landscapes of the United States and the United Kingdom is essential. 

To make this clear, let’s look at a few critical factors: 

  • Legal Framework: The U.S. and the U.K. have distinct legal structures governing freedom of speech and anti-terrorism. The First Amendment in the U.S. offers broad protections for speech, while U.K. laws include more stringent regulations against hate speech and incitement.
  • Extradition Treaties: The U.S. and the U.K. have an existing extradition treaty, but any extradition request must meet stringent criteria and offer sufficient evidence of criminal activity.
  • Evidence and Intent: Authorities would need to prove that the individual’s online activities were not just free speech but crossed into illegal behavior, such as incitement to violence or material support for terrorism.

Ultimately, extradition heavily depends on the specifics of each case. It will hinge on actions that align with or violate local/international laws. While cooperation between countries is necessary for combating global threats, balancing it with individual rights remains challenging. 

This table provides an overview of US-UK Extradition Treaty 2003, which is still subject to debate: 

Aspect US Requirements UK Requirements Evidential Threshold 'Reasonable grounds for believing there is evidence' 'Reasonable basis to believe' Indictment Basis Grand Jury Indictments Prima Facie Evidence Human Rights Consideration Included but less emphasized Strongly Considered Reciprocity Less Obligatory Highly Expected Prohibition of Extradition Faces Death Penalty, Specialty Arrangements Faces Death Penalty, No Specialty Arrangements, Familiar with Third State

Let’s Get Educated

When discussing whether the London police can extradite Americans for their online activities, especially those advocating for jihadis to be ousted from the U.K., it is crucial to consider several vital facts. The history of these details illuminates the complexities and injustice involved. 

Firstly, you need to understand that treaties govern extradition. The United States and the United Kingdom have a bilateral extradition treaty. This was signed in 2003. The treaty outlines extraditable crimes. However, activities like posting opinions online may not meet these criteria, even if they are against or supportive of jihadi Sharia law activists invited to the U.K. 

The Extradition Treaty, which governs extradition between the U.K. and the U.S., was signed in 2003.

This agreement includes: 

  • Extraditable Offenses: Crimes that are punishable by more than one year of imprisonment in both countries.
  • Probable Cause: Evidence must be presented to justify the extradition request.
  • Dual Criminality: The treaty states that the offense must be recognized as a crime in both jurisdictions, a condition known as “dual criminality.”

“Extraditable offenses generally involve serious crimes such as terrorism, murder, or significant fraud. Simply expressing political or controversial views online usually doesn’t qualify.” – Michael Ehline, Esq.

Furthermore, several critical factors could prevent such an extradition: 

  • Nature of the offense: Cyber activities often fall into a gray area that may not be easily classified under the treaty’s terms.
  • Freedom of speech: U.S. law fiercely protects the right to free speech, including, within certain limits, online activities.
  • Legal standards: Extradition requests must meet high evidentiary standards and legal thresholds that might not align across jurisdictions.

As a result, the London police can initiate an extradition request if U.S. law also censors the same speech as the U.K. However, if Harris loses, there is little chance the U.S. will adopt the same anti-free speech laws as the U.K. Hence, there is no dual criminality here, and it is highly unlikely you can be sent to a U.K. prison for being hard on Muslim immigrants as a U.S. keyboard warrior. If you are facing a legal issue or are suffering a personal injury from a false arrest, please contact Ehline Law Firm at (213) 596-9642.

Expert Expects Insurance Companies to Take Legal Action Against COVID Vaccine Makers

Expert Expects Insurance Companies to Take Legal Action Against COVID Vaccine Makers
Expert Expects Insurance Companies to Take Legal Action Against COVID Vaccine Makers

As the pandemic began to spread violently across the states and the world, it became imperative to promote vaccination and improve vaccine access to curb the spread, prevent infectious diseases, and save lives.

However, with COVID-19 vaccinations in full swing, some cases started to arise where people suffered from severe illness and other medical complications after getting vaccinated, resulting in death.

How do Regulators Monitor COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Vaccine Effectiveness After Approval?

The regulatory bodies (including the Ministry of Health, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, and others) are responsible for effectively monitoring the vaccine’s safety and ensuring the benefits outweigh the risks after approving the vaccine.

To ensure effective monitoring of the safety of the vaccine, they:

  • Review and analyze adverse vaccine effects reported by public health authorities, consumers, and any information the vaccine companies receive locally and globally.
  • Evaluate summary or complete data of clinical trials, which include vaccine candidates with a range of age groups.
  • Collect safety evidence during all phases of the vaccine development process.
  • Implement passive surveillance systems, including systems that monitor real-time vaccine efficacy data and compare it to events expected to happen by chance.
  • Take immediate action to mitigate risks.
  • Ensure vaccine makers abide by the regulations, especially by carrying out ongoing safety surveillance since the vaccine’s inception.
  • Requires vaccine makers to have a risk management plan that monitors the risks and aims to minimize them.
  • Review data on vaccines developed for new variants against immune response, just like seasonal influenza vaccines.

Healthcare professionals and medical providers reporting all events, including severe disease from reinfection and adverse effects, help regulators assess the role of the vaccines in causing the adverse effects and assist in determining safety issues.

Regulators also work closely with public health agencies (those behind vaccination programs) to take action if any safety issue arises. They can take various steps, including updating product information, preventing the release of a particular batch of vaccines, and restricting vaccine authorization. Regulators only approve vaccines once they determine the known and potential risks.

Commonly Reported Vaccination Adverse Events by World Health Organization

According to the World Health Organization, the major adverse events arising from the use of COVID-19 vaccines are as follows:

  • Myocarditis
  • Pericarditis
  • Anaphylaxis.

Myocarditis, or heart muscle inflammation, is a rare adverse event of mRNA vaccine use. Symptoms of myocarditis may occur within five days of the COVID-19 vaccine. At the same time, pericarditis symptoms can take two to three weeks after vaccination. Symptoms often resolve after some time, but some severe cases may require hospitalization.

Higher rates of myocarditis arising from Moderna are observed in some high-income countries. However, regulators believe that other factors are influencing these higher reporting rates. Sporadic cases of Anaphylaxis have also been reported, but even those TRUE numbers appear to be hidden or minimized by the CDC. However, under routine vaccination procedures, people vaccinated must remain at the center for 15 minutes so medical professionals can provide a rapid medical response to Anaphylaxis.

For AstraZeneca, Janssen, and CanSino, the following are the most significant adverse events reported:

  • Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome
  • Immune Thrombocytopenic purpura
  • Guillain-Barre Syndrome.

In the United States, there are two to three cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome for every million Adenovirus vector vaccines. The country also records immune thrombocytopenic purpura and Guillain-barre syndrome for every one in 100,000 people. In a minimal number of people, immune thrombocytopenic can be fatal.

Besides the adverse effects mentioned above, studies show that vaccination policies have led to severe problems, including reduced health system capacity, socio-economic disparity and inequality, increased distrust of other vaccines, and more.

Fear of Lawsuits Over Early Deaths

On August 7, 2022, Dr. Harvey Risch, a top epidemiologist, spoke with Just the News about how insurance companies may start filing lawsuits against COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers. The expert expects insurance companies to take legal action against COVID-19 vaccine makers over ‘early’ and ‘unexpected’ deaths, causing them to lose millions to early mortality claims.

Insurance companies overestimated life expectancies for individuals who took the COVID-19 vaccine. However, early unexpected mortality claims pose a severe financial risk to insurers, so they must figure out how to manage them. One way to reduce their losses and financial risk is through lawsuits.

Dr. Risch isn’t the only one suggesting action against vaccine manufacturers. Scott Davison, CEO of OneAmerica, claims that death rates rose to 40%. He stated that most early death claims aren’t filed as COVID-related deaths. Compared to 2020, Lincoln National, one of the oldest and largest stock insurance companies in the United States, paid a 163% increase in death benefits in 2021, when COVID-19 vaccines became available.

To make up for their losses, experts believe that insurance companies might further study the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on the public and whether or not the vaccines contribute to the increasing number of non-COVID-related deaths in the country.

Since March 2021, posts in the United States have been circulating claiming that insurers are not processing life payments to vaccinated people. However, the American Council of Life Insurers denied these claims, disregarding them as “misinformation.” They also do not view the vaccines as experimental, and any denials for claims have nothing to do with receiving the COVID-19 vaccine dose. Reuters states that there is no link to rejections of life insurance claims.

Tired of the Big Pharma Lies Passed on by Its Willing Accomplices in the For-Profit Media?

We believe most claim rejections are just dirty insurance company tactics that an experienced attorney can handle for you. Ehline Law and our COVID-19 vaccination attorneys can negotiate with insurers on your behalf to get you the benefits you deserve.

By law, if a vaccine causes harm to a consumer, they can not pursue a lawsuit against the pharmaceutical companies (sweetheart deal in exchange for billions in campaign donations?). However, they can qualify for financial compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. If you’re suffering from a severe illness from the COVID-19 vaccine, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation on your case.

Plastic Consumption and Cancer

Many people worldwide, especially in the United States and the European region, are used to drinking coffee. Starbucks has become a Gay Pride month tradition over and above the East, especially in California. It seems like everyone wants to start the day with a boost of coffee on the West Coast in particular.

What happens when you ingest tiny plastic particles, and why is it happening with coffee cups? It’s also happening with plastic tea bags, so don’t be jealous of all your tea toddlers.

Red Coffee Cup. Plastic Consumption and Cancer

Plastics in Starbucks Cups?

Research on Coffee Cups is Alarming

“..lining tends to release an enormous number of plastic nanoparticles.”

You may have grounds for a lawsuit for plastic pollution and lying about the coffee cup’s plastic lining. But you probably can’t sue for fear of cancer, as you cannot sue for fear of catching something from the coffee shop, etc. Let’s look at the facts and develop the basis of your lawsuit for tiny plastic particles found in coffee cups.

ValidPeople in the West prefer coffee over tea or any other hot drink when starting the day. Most coffee shops and chains serve coffee in paper cups with a plastic lining. All kinds of food delivery vehicles are filled with toxic chemicals that our U.S. and local politicians and agencies have found “acceptable,” even though they cause plastic pollution. I am attorney Michael Ehline.

Today, I will discuss why ingesting plastic from a coffee shop cup can lead to health problems, including cancer from tiny plastic particles and low-density polyethylene because chemicals and nanoparticles are released from plastic food contact materials into the human body. We will also discuss whether or not you can sue for fear of cancer or some other cause of action surrounding this latest discovery about the thin plastic film in coffee cups.

Dangerous products must be labeled as hazardous. But, as discussed, the state sometimes says the dangerous toxins are low enough to warrant a warning label. Because of this, many manufacturing companies and food service organizations refuse to label their products as hazardous. Typically, it takes a lawsuit from a personal injury attorney to convince these wrongdoers that government regulations are a floor, not a ceiling.

These defendants can still be sued under a local or class action lawsuit under various negligence and fraud theories, as will be discussed. This is too little too late for many victims, as they didn’t have a chance to stop using the product before developing cancer and other health problems.

COVID CUPS?

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of plastic-lined cups has increased tremendously. While people think they taste their favorite coffee, they consume more than just the flavor.

But it’s known that hot beverages typically release more significant amounts of cancer-causing chemicals than cold will release microscopic plastic particles into the cup and down your throat.

Surprisingly, you may not even bother when told about the particular ingredient entering your body when you drink coffee. Still, you must be aware of it because it is your right to know what you consume. To your surprise, you are not only sipping coffee, but with it, you are also taking in tiny plastic particles. You’ll be surprised to know they are in trillions if you think they are not many.

All these particles enter your body when you take a sip from a paper coffee cup lined with plastic.

Research on the Coffee Cup is Alarming

Research has recently been carried out on coffee cups that have yielded alarming results.

The research was carried out on coffee with a plastic film inside it. The film helps prevent the coffee from seeping through the cup and keeps it hot for longer. According to the research, the particular lining releases many plastic nanoparticles. The data suggests that a single liter releases over 5 trillion plastic nanoparticles through the plastic lining.

All these particles are released into a 12-ounce single-use cup. The research data has been shared through the Environmental Science & Technology journal. To be more explicit, 1 liter translates to 34 ounces of fluid.

Christopher Zangmeister’s Deep Dive

Christopher Zangmeister is the acting group leader and a chemist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Material Measurement Laboratory. His deep dive has informed much of what we will discuss here, so let’s get started.

Is It Okay If the Government Says So?

No way. The U.S. government has subsidized organizations like WHO, often held hostage by research endowments and funds from manufacturing companies and others. So it makes sense that the heads of these agencies, like the DHS or FDA, often worked for large pharmaceutical companies, etc.

So, no, most experts agree you cannot trust much about what the government says about health unless you are one of the published scientists who work at these agencies, who are accountable to politicians who are beholden to campaign reelection fund donors, including the plastics industrial complex.

Let’s look at what Uncle Sam says about ingesting plastic nanoparticles. Government researchers quickly note that the total amount of plastic particles leaching into hot liquids from single-use cups will typically fall well under the guidelines for safe human consumption levels established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Some environmental experts agree with this, but only to a small degree. Christopher Reddy, a senior scientist and expert in marine chemistry and geochemistry with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, said: “I read that sentence and go, well, is it time for us to re-evaluate the guidelines?” Rolf Ha, director of the Center for Environmental Health Engineering at Arizona State University, says we still must take steps to “…measure what is arriving in our bodies, where it is deposited and what it does there.”

Halden noted that Asbestos causes harm due to its similar tiny particles being inhaled. He states that these particles will accumulate in our lung tissue, which generates an inflammation response, leading to scarring and eventual asbestos-related cancer. According to Halden, “Asbestos itself is relatively benign. It’s an inorganic material.”

He says: “What makes it toxic and kills 90,000 people a year is that it has particles that lodge in human tissue.”

Sure, The World Health Organization claims the risk from microplastics in drinking water is low, too. However, NIST chemist Christopher Zangmeister conducted a study about this. His colleagues filled nylon slow-cooker bags with “ultra-high” purity water. They did the same experiment on polyethylene-lined paper coffee cups you’d buy at a typical grocery store or Starbucks. The findings are alarming. Large and small plastic nanoparticles are everywhere.

Sadly, little information is known about the long-term impact of microplastics on humans. According to Tufenkji, “There’s no research. But this points to the need to do those studies.” Nathalie Tufenkji, a professor of chemical engineering at Montreal University, said, “Think of people who drink one or two or three cups….”

Think about it. How much plastic is lodged in their tissue FOREVER? Zangmeister has found that a single human hair may contain over 1,000 particles with a diameter of 100nm.

In summary, nanoparticles are tiny, but you take more into your living tissue each time you sip your coffee. Researchers estimate that consuming 13 cups of hot coffee will add one particle of nanoplastic inside your body for every seven cells.

AlarmResearchersovered that nanoplastic particles are released no matter how cold, warm, or hot the liquid inside the cup is. Boiling water is not a prerequisite to releasing these toxic particles. However, as more particles are released, the water temperature rises more to 100 degrees Fahrenheit, and the particle increase remains constant. The studies were conducted on many retailers’ cups and plastic cooking bags. It was found that a slow cooker bag kept at hot temperatures for an hour released around 35 trillion plastic nanoparticles per liter of water. Similarly, hot water poured on coffee cups containing 12 ounces of liquid steeped for 20 minutes leached about 5.1 trillion plastic nanoparticles per liter after cooling.

Average Hot Beverage Temperate and Particles Release Standard

In 2019, research shared by Food Science through its journal revealed that hot beverages have an average temperature of between 130 and 160 degrees.

This means that when you consume a hot beverage through a paper cup with a plastic lining, you consume the maximum number of plastic nanoparticles. The most alarming part of the research is that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is okay with people using a single plastic cup and its particles released.

These nanoparticles are small enough to get inside your bloodstream and can become permanently lodged in human tissues and organs. (Source – Rolf Halden, Center for Environmental Health director.)

Other Sources of Toxic Plastic Exposure Ingestion

  • Plumbing – Most modern homes and buildings use plastic, and plastic water filters are manufactured from a polymeric material base
  • Paper cups – Manufacturers don’t use hot water to wash ups before sending them to end-user consumers

Ideas To Avoid Plastic Exposure in Hot Beverages and Food

  • Drink ultra-high purity water from glass or ceramic containers
  • Never use single-use beverage cups
  • Stay away from anything associated with plastic
  • Take fish oil, Curcumin, and antioxidants, as these may contain anti-cancer chemicals.

Potentially Liable Parties

You cannot sue for monetary compensation over the fear of being diagnosed with cancer or another disease. But there are other ways to get justice, including injunctions to halt the production of toxic chemicals in foods, etc.

Here are some ideas you can use concerning plastic nanoparticles:

  • The U.S. Government – Eight environmental and human health organizations have sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for failing to ban phthalate chemicals in F&B packaging despite years of research proving its danger to human and ecological health. (Source.)
  • Cup manufacturers – They and anyone in the chain of commerce face legal ramifications.
  • Coffee Houses – Grocers and anyone else in the chain of commerce.

For example, McDonald’s and Burger King are being sued for using ‘forever chemicals’ called PFAs in their packaging (Source).

Potential Causes of Action from Plastic Chemical Exposure in Coffee Cups and Lids

  • False and misleading advertising – misleading environmental claims result from a lawsuit for fraud and deceptive advertising in California courts. (deceptive or misleading when marketing materials claim the cups are “plastic-free” and “compostable.”).
  • False labels – But last year, California politicians dependent on donations from big corporations changed that after a Los Angeles judge upheld a voters’ initiative requiring coffee shops from Blue Bottle, including Starbucks, to place a cancer warning label on their cups. (Under Proposition 65, these businesses faced fines of $2,500 per incident because coffee retailers couldn’t prove coffee had only a negligible amount of the carcinogen acrylamide.). But California’s Office of Administrative Law decided to screw the voters and issued a Prop 65 exemption for coffee corporations.

Irrespective of the political class playing defense for their party donors in the single-party state of California, over  90 coffee retailers, including McDonald’s and small coffee chains, face pending lawsuits for knowingly selling carcinogen-laced coffee. Some people are against the FDA allowing rocket fuel chemicals in certain dry foods (Source Breast Cancer Prevention Partners.).

Schedule a Free Consultation With A Plastic Coffee Cup Injury Law Firm Today

Did you or someone you love suffer fraud, negligent misrepresentation, or cancer caused by plastic in coffee cups? You’re not alone. Call us today to schedule a free consultation with a Los Angeles personal injury attorney who helps wounded victims in all types of catastrophic injury claims in Southern California.

Call now at (213) 596-9642 or use our convenient online contact form for verification purposes only and a swift return phone call. Our prompt, responsive attorneys can help you obtain maximum compensation, or we will go to trial and fight for you for a decisive victory.

Citations:

  • Kujundžić, R. N., Stepanić, V., Milković, L., Gašparović, A. Č., Tomljanović, M., & Trošelj, K. G. (2019). Curcumin and its Potential for Systemic Targeting of Inflamm-Aging and Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer. International journal of molecular sciences, 20(5), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051180
  • Plastic Health Coalition
  • Rolf Halden, Ph.D., Director, Center for Environmental Health Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe
  • Material Measurement Laboratory of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md
  • World Health Organization (WHO)
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Woods Hole, Mass.